Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?)

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Wed, 22 August 2012 16:54 UTC

From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:54:09 +0200
Thread-Topic: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?)
Thread-Index: Ac2Afj5F+3uXMSPnSGiUg6SUbV8quAAB72xA
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E52298D9D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <5035007C.2070809@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5035007C.2070809@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?)
Precedence: list

Hi Simon,

This issue has been already documented in depth in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-03.

I'm not sure if there is a value to re-discuss this point in the gap analysis document.

Cheers,
Med
 

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : sunset4-bounces@ietf.org 
>[mailto:sunset4-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Simon Perreault
>Envoyé : mercredi 22 août 2012 17:54
>À : sunset4@ietf.org
>Objet : [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?)
>
>Sunsetters,
>
>Recently there has been discussion in v6ops about a problem 
>that arises 
>when a network infrastructure featuring NAT64+DNS64 is used by 
>IPv6-only 
>as well as dual-stack hosts. The problem is that you want the 
>IPv6-only 
>hosts to use the DNS64 but not the dual-stack hosts.
>
>This is a well-known problem that has been discussed in behave and for 
>which there is a solution that involves the hosts 
>(draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic), and another 
>that involves 
>only the network (provision different DNS resolver addresses to 
>IPv6-only and dual-stack hosts). Those solutions may not apply in many 
>cases: the first solution requires that all hosts be modified, 
>while the 
>second solution requires that one be able to differentiate IPv6-only 
>from dual-stack hosts.
>
>Question for the WG: should this be discussed in 
>draft-ietf-sunset4-gapanalysis? If so, we would appreciate additional 
>input. Additional solution ideas would also be appreciated...
>
>Thanks,
>Simon
>-- 
>DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
>NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
>STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
>_______________________________________________
>sunset4 mailing list
>sunset4@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
>

[sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Simon Perreault
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Cameron Byrne
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Marc Blanchet
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Vízdal Aleš
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Simon Perreault
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Marc Blanchet
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) mohamed.boucadair
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Simon Perreault
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Marc Blanchet
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) mohamed.boucadair
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Michael Richardson
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Simon Perreault
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Michael Richardson
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Simon Perreault
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Hui Deng
Re: [sunset4] An IPv4 sunset problem (?) Hui Deng