Re: [sunset4] Declaring IPv4 Historic

[joel jaeggli <[e-mail]>]

On 3/15/16 10:15 AM, Alejandro Acosta wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>   I read both, your blog post and your draft.
>   I believe this is a quite interesting idea, actually I support it but
> my suggestion is to make (the whole draft) it more "IPv4 core" centric.
>   I mean, for example:
> 
> "The IETF does not update Historic RFCs.  Therefore, the IETF will no
>    longer work on IPv4 technologies, including transition technologies.
> "
> 
>   I would remove transition technologies, also, as suggested by Marc,
> more context around this text would be a good idea.

I have demonstrably less interest in transition technologies then I do
in the continued function operation and maintenance of legacy ipv4 until
such time as I not longer need it. which is not to say that transition
technologies don't have glaring issues. many of them do.

> Regards,
> 
> Alejandro,
> 
> 
> El 3/15/2016 a las 2:39 AM, Lee Howard escribió:
>> As noted below, I’ve posted a draft. I thought I’d start a thread for
>> discussing it.
>>
>> PLEASE Please please read the draft before commenting. It’s very
>> short, less than 500 words, and I anticipate a lot of people having
>> strong feelings about it. I would really rather not waste time arguing
>> about things it doesn’t say.
>>
>> To that end, I’ve also written a blog post, explaining in a level of
>> detail I thought inappropriate for the
>> draft: <http://www.wleecoyote.com/blog/ipv4-historic.htm>http://www.wleecoyote.com/blog/ipv4-historic.htm
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Lee
>>
>> From: sunset4
>> <<mailto:[e-mail]>[e-mail]> on behalf
>> of Wesley George <[e-mail]
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> Date: Monday, March 14, 2016 at 6:28 PM
>> To: "<mailto:[e-mail]>[e-mail]" <[e-mail]
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> Subject: [sunset4] Agenda items?
>>
>>     As you can see, we have a meeting scheduled for BA. 
>>     As of right now, we have a single agenda item:
>>
>>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-sunset4-v4historic-00
>>
>>     While I fully expect that this item can expand to fill all
>>     available time, if there are other things that the WG wishes to
>>     discuss, please respond ASAP to request agenda time. 
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Wes
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Anything below this line has been added by my company’s mail
>>     server, I have no control over it.
>>
>>     -----------
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner
>>     Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential,
>>     or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This
>>     E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
>>     to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of
>>     this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>>     distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents
>>     of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may
>>     be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please
>>     notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original
>>     and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
>>     _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing
>>     list [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4 
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sunset4 mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sunset4 mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
>