[Supa] Worked example of SNMP blocking

John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com> Sat, 11 February 2017 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <strazpdj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C987D1289B0; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:24:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vc-Ux89SPl8q; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:24:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A5E12997E; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:24:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id z134so36285619lff.3; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:24:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2O2hnCutJpNZq7QF8WbLD2UmU2lcCQ2ELQxUcKDm3v4=; b=nw9kGG2oZKBTsD6n+oPeBhVoNW1jkAbQL7YMbnrKa79AqvjZwWUHHDzbmeYLSRMWtH KyWyG2DM32YeAoRVlffScoQxGnx+sOIzq1E22Fi+owW6/Om9bLHvSqNAZcWxrT/BxIDg kvVKjepFBxMfOVJMN7dljI+c2kkpJRhPrmBz3Sk7S0GkI9mXl5XRLXmrecda6ISwgyWs bVHsr/A1XKa+uBFqPgy2WDpv6Vklqcbt6q6LWYjPjZJ+58AZrbbfMOV5FoOyKudgYCz5 n0A1NE4aBC+CNq6fZTWonPKtwWkmoH6S8LLpCPqO16zT7sULSnMfCpJkKcgwi05IPk1f a0Xg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2O2hnCutJpNZq7QF8WbLD2UmU2lcCQ2ELQxUcKDm3v4=; b=hxU10W5lkMqdAiUrQHHZWioCRpn5oIjSgw9c977lL+dF6UwpAw2uAjS2qD1FKVyDMJ MwLF+9Jot6wr6gjz0ga1Zsw3H/cdjKh/dPXIZzzRnXwrUWohTgeK5ZOXAbKwDUrNZUxF 7bGR8WxklXZ3kpeavwuM/JEsO1WsWfpwYZCU7nNbHyX5IKBzz5A0xRx/nnDO9KXdWG62 8l71AmqexmW1naPjW+NPlYUgRTiBWip42xe35DZpAv4F56Xk+yGSFhN3TWobV0eO5CoW n+kpjPoSVQ/0y5AqIhI9Yxeg3NGGiF0H4TGsSgWOoquR0wieDNljUJkzOgwhO3OidEsr qD5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mhJbosLuRc9eQUdxiYHylrBRql3AAW801Aldmt92A5Tw5yqOZvnrfNGLOs8+hrCCGc/y4/wHxYdXbwEw==
X-Received: by 10.25.196.197 with SMTP id u188mr4047841lff.180.1486841086402; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:24:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.21.203 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:24:45 -0800 (PST)
From: John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:24:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJwYUrFXGvVYFx92Q_J8pWngDRtdd82XH1KSDn0qkY0dSLaDtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "supa@ietf.org" <supa@ietf.org>, supa-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="001a114b114acb02370548462a28"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/supa/DWEzaSBK6KBdsmQ0FE2-eypTzeY>
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com>
Subject: [Supa] Worked example of SNMP blocking
X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions\) related issues." <supa.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/supa/>
List-Post: <mailto:supa@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 19:24:58 -0000

Attached please find a draft of a worked example on SNMP blocking.
Comments are of course very welcome!

-- 
regards,
John and Joel