Re: [Supa] Worked example of SNMP blocking
"Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bwietf@bwijnen.net> Sun, 12 February 2017 10:59 UTC
Return-Path: <bwietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDCE1294A7 for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:59:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o8wbZozI3Hog for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:59:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 950791294A1 for <supa@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:59:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Macintosh-4.fritz.box ([IPv6:2001:981:602b:1:846e:4cf:9259:6cc1]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id jmzf1u00K2vR5j201mzgLH; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:59:41 +0100
To: John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com>, "supa@ietf.org" <supa@ietf.org>, supa-chairs@ietf.org
References: <CAJwYUrFXGvVYFx92Q_J8pWngDRtdd82XH1KSDn0qkY0dSLaDtA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bwietf@bwijnen.net>
Message-ID: <b6de1c04-d8b3-5c9d-43b6-44bdc561a52f@bwijnen.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:59:39 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJwYUrFXGvVYFx92Q_J8pWngDRtdd82XH1KSDn0qkY0dSLaDtA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/supa/by_dW5CiWeYtnzZyhPGQJtPi7I8>
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Subject: Re: [Supa] Worked example of SNMP blocking
X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions\) related issues." <supa.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/supa/>
List-Post: <mailto:supa@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:59:50 -0000
Thanks, I will try to review coming week. Bert On 11/02/2017 20:24, John Strassner wrote: > Attached please find a draft of a worked example on SNMP blocking. > Comments are of course very welcome! > > -- > regards, > John and Joel > > > _______________________________________________ > Supa mailing list > Supa@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa
- [Supa] Worked example of SNMP blocking John Strassner
- Re: [Supa] Worked example of SNMP blocking Bert Wijnen (IETF)