Re: [Syslog] Review comments on draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-01.txt

["tom.petch" <[e-mail]>]

Eliding the previously agreed parts

Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Lonvick" <[e-mail]>
To: "tom.petch" <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Syslog] Review comments on draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-01.txt


> Hi Tom,
>
> I got all excited about the next version of draft-ietf-syslog-dtls getting
> in before the cutoff time that I went ahead and edited plain-tcp.  :-)
>
> Comments in-line.
>
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, tom.petch wrote:
>
<snip>
> > And, perhaps the most important, somewhere I think you should cover the
nature
> > of TCP; give it a message and it will buffer it, may be for days, and then
lose
> > it because the connection is taken down.  Should you recommend the use of
PSH
> > for all messages?
>
> CML> I added a paragraph near the end of the Introduction about that.
> (Which I have not run by Rainer yet. :)  Let me know if that's what you
> were thinking about.

Yes, your new paragraph is exactly what I had in mind.

> CML> We appreciate the review.  The updated draft should be out soon and
> I'll ask for another review of it rsn.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> > Tom Petch