IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Syslog] Review comments on draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-01.txt

Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com> Thu, 01 April 2010 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <clonvick@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: syslog@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: syslog@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DA93A6950 for <syslog@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.350, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, J_CHICKENPOX_35=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 639T1uHBbwcD for <syslog@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309E83A67B1 for <syslog@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAN6qtEurR7Ht/2dsb2JhbACbSnGdLJkJhQEEgyM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,350,1267401600"; d="scan'208";a="507156400"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2010 21:13:58 +0000
Received: from sjc-cde-011.cisco.com (sjc-cde-011.cisco.com [171.69.16.68]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o31LDwZM014722; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:13:58 GMT
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:13:58 -0700
From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com>
To: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
In-Reply-To: <000301cac08b$88e3d460$0601a8c0@allison>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1004011413210.24986@sjc-cde-011.cisco.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1001260614300.6144@sjc-cde-011.cisco.com> <007301ca9f74$d7dba800$0601a8c0@allison> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1003081346330.21786@sjc-cde-011.cisco.com> <000301cac08b$88e3d460$0601a8c0@allison>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: syslog@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Syslog] Review comments on draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-01.txt
X-BeenThere: syslog@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Issues in Network Event Logging <syslog.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog>
List-Post: <mailto:syslog@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:19:11 -0000

Hi Tom,

On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, tom.petch wrote:

> Extracting one of the two unresolved issues
> "> > A.2
>>> %d10 is LF not NL; I do not know which you mean.
>>
>> CML> I've seen it called both.  I'm trying to track down a normative
>> reference.  Do you have one?  Till then, I'm going to leave it as NL
>> (%d10).  [Pending review by Rainer.]
> "
> RFC20/RFC020/RFC0020 says that LF is 0/10 and I do not think
> that it has changed since:-)

Got it.  It's now changed throughout and a new draft submitted.

Thanks,
Chris

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status