Re: [Syslog] Status of syslog/dtls ISSUES

["Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <[e-mail]>]

Most of this looks pretty straight forward: 
> Issue 8 - Tim Polk DISCUSS
> STATUS: Discussed by Tom and David.  Joe to incorporate changes.
> 
[Joe] For this one I have Section 5 as:

"Implementations of this
   specification MUST support DTLS over UDP and MUST support DTLS over
   DCCP [RFC5238] if the DCCP transport is available at run-time."

And section 6 as:

" DCCP has congestion control.  For this reason, when DCCP is
   available, the syslog over DTLS over DCCP option is RECOMMENDED in
   preference to the syslog over the DTLS over UDP option."

I'm think the RECOMMENDED in the section 6 needs to be replaced with
something else, I'm not quite sure what.  

> Issue 9, 9a, and 9b - from a Tim Polk COMMENT
> STATUS:  It looks like 9 and 9a have been discussed and Tom has
proposed
> text to resolve them.  Sean proposed text on 9b.  I'd like some
discussion
> on that.
> 
[Joe] I'm not sure 9b is necessary, but I don't think it causes harm.
I'd modify the text to say " implementations often generate their own
key pairs" since its possible for the generation to be done outside the
implementation.  

> Issue 10 - Jari Arrko DISCUSS
> STATUS: Same as Issue 1.  Is the text proposed by Sean good to cover
all
> of this Issue, Issue 1 and Issue 2?
> 
[Joe] I incorporated the text, I'm not sure it covers all the issues, I
think Tom initiated some discussion on the TLS list, but  I don't think
it changes the result.