[Syslog] draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not IPFIX?
Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> Tue, 15 February 2011 11:17 UTC
Return-Path: <jeroen@unfix.org>
X-Original-To: syslog@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: syslog@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D55F3A6A71 for <syslog@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 03:17:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hyV70iMpb5k6 for <syslog@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 03:17:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from abaddon.unfix.org (abaddon.unfix.org [62.220.146.203]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9037B3A6C9F for <syslog@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 03:17:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:620:20:1001:216:d3ff:fe25:14da] (spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com [IPv6:2001:620:20:1001:216:d3ff:fe25:14da]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jeroen) by abaddon.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97416205D1; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:17:24 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4D5A60C8.3090000@unfix.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:17:28 +0100
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Organization: Unfix
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: syslog@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Sam Johnston <sj@google.com>, cee@mitre.org
Subject: [Syslog] draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not IPFIX?
X-BeenThere: syslog@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Issues in Network Event Logging <syslog.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog>
List-Post: <mailto:syslog@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:17:32 -0000
Hi, As the subject states, for both this cloud[1] and CEE[2] proposals, why not use IPFIX instead for structured logging data!? Greets, Jeroen [1] http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-cloud-log-00.txt [2] http://cee.mitre.org/
- [Syslog] draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not IPFIX? Jeroen Massar
- Re: [Syslog] draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not I… Jeroen Massar
- Re: [Syslog] draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not I… Rainer Gerhards
- Re: [Syslog] draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not I… Jeroen Massar
- Re: [Syslog] draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not I… Rainer Gerhards
- Re: [Syslog] draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not I… Jeroen Massar
- Re: [Syslog] draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not I… Heinbockel, Bill
- Re: [Syslog] draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not I… Dan Schlitt
- Re: [Syslog] draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not I… Gene Golovinsky