Re: [ledbat] pointer to Lars' work on packet preemption issues in backgrounding

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Thu, 20 November 2008 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ledbat-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tana-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tana-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDFC3A6A47; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:53:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ledbat@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ledbat@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DDF3A6A47 for <ledbat@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:53:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zfNzVdtq9K6z for <ledbat@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:53:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632823A6A38 for <ledbat@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:53:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.94.243] ([130.129.94.243]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAKKrC8r015021 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:53:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4925CE38.2030707@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:53:12 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <4925C6E1.8070109@isi.edu> <F9AD404B-CCDF-4915-93E3-59F5B5A39AED@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <F9AD404B-CCDF-4915-93E3-59F5B5A39AED@tzi.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: ledbat@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ledbat] pointer to Lars' work on packet preemption issues in backgrounding
X-BeenThere: ledbat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of the LEDBAT WG <ledbat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat>, <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ledbat>
List-Post: <mailto:ledbat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat>, <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ledbat-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ledbat-bounces@ietf.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2008, at 14:21 , Joe Touch wrote:
> 
>> routers don't preempt packets
> 
> RFC 2686
> 
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t13/feature/guide/ftmmlppp.html
> 
> 
> Of course, this is irrelevant in the home.
> (Just wanted to fix the overgeneralization.)
> 
> Gruesse, Carsten

Thanks - Dave pointed that out to me as well. I was not aware of it;
it's certainly still reasonable that "most routers" don't support
preemption.

Ditto for hosts.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkklzjgACgkQE5f5cImnZrtp/QCg90llatInJGOhS1Qah1Z+6Rc7
2q8An33q8JebugHaLLBiPwY3EJB/Zz73
=zGUC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ledbat mailing list
ledbat@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat