Re: [ledbat] list of reasons for needing multiple TCP connections

"Kartik Chandrayana (karchand)" <karchand@cisco.com> Thu, 20 November 2008 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ledbat-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tana-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tana-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF533A6A38; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:54:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ledbat@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ledbat@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7053A6A5C for <ledbat@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:54:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 775fx04A-kTT for <ledbat@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8786C3A6984 for <ledbat@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:54:11 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,639,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="107390837"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2008 20:54:10 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAKKsAbj014398; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:54:10 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAKKsA24029836; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:54:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.73]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:54:10 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:53:29 -0800
Message-ID: <A0988C2F192F124FAFE3D70264C04587077A130C@xmb-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4925CC2A.9080606@isi.edu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [ledbat] list of reasons for needing multiple TCP connections
Thread-Index: AclLUNCyhNO8NpyaSS6a6rB7YJVFdQAAKXsA
References: <4925BDEE.6090101@isi.edu> <8c99930d0811201206yb0ef259v28c361438cb14773@mail.gmail.com> <A0988C2F192F124FAFE3D70264C04587077A12EC@xmb-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com> <4925CC2A.9080606@isi.edu>
From: "Kartik Chandrayana (karchand)" <karchand@cisco.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Nov 2008 20:54:10.0229 (UTC) FILETIME=[22EF7650:01C94B52]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1799; t=1227214450; x=1228078450; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=karchand@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Kartik=20Chandrayana=20(karchand)=22=20<karchan d@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[ledbat]=20list=20of=20reasons=20for=20 needing=20multiple=20TCP=20connections |Sender:=20; bh=r1rtNF9DLA+kQjRfkROKy5RY7eESuz0/T4ndB+KGR0w=; b=cog56RZovhlQPd3sLL3EGviGe48uKh4or/Aa30hG1vcebDdRRHFqsjZUwV Nw1vvto+SWhJWgdA+du+ROBleOWvTaB0o/4HD+Cagjf/XsvoFOgc/MeA0BI1 9iGsM+Yg41;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=karchand@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Cc: ledbat@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ledbat] list of reasons for needing multiple TCP connections
X-BeenThere: ledbat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of the LEDBAT WG <ledbat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat>, <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ledbat>
List-Post: <mailto:ledbat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat>, <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ledbat-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ledbat-bounces@ietf.org

Joe,

  I am also not aware if parallelization of network code is implemented
in OSes. However, I think it would be reasonable to expect that tcpcb
lookups are done in a centralized fashion and once that is done,
multiple tcp's can be processed in different cpus. Even the lookups can
be distributed as they are only a read operation.

Thanks,
-Kartik

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch@ISI.EDU] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 2:44 PM
To: Kartik Chandrayana (karchand)
Cc: Andrew G. Malis; ledbat@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ledbat] list of reasons for needing multiple TCP
connections

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Kartik Chandrayana (karchand) wrote:
> Andy, Joe:
> 
> One reason I can think of using multiple TCP connections is to 
> overcome the non-negotiation of window-scale parameter on most boxes. 
> With default window scale parameters, i.e 0, the congestion window is 
> limited to 64KB only and thus for any pipe with 
> bandwidth-delay-product greater than 64KB, a single TCP connection 
> cannot keep the pipe full. In such a case, it would be beneficial to
have multiple TCP connections.
> 
> Also, since TCP design was mostly with single cpu in mind, I think 
> multiple TCP connections can harness the multi-cpu architectures 
> better than a single lean fast TCP.

That presumes that the OS implements parallelization in the network
code; I don't know if that's recently offered, but it has been the
sticking point in the past.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkklzCoACgkQE5f5cImnZrt8lQCcDHUECfyDkJFHy8kXSSSI5gPE
tEEAnAhQv1XX45F/TfCqGXZgrDoo7ed9
=JSeb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ledbat mailing list
ledbat@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat