Re: [tap] RFC Status?
Ovid <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com> Wed, 17 September 2014 19:57 UTC
Return-Path: <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: tap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538F51A0AE5 for <tap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_REDIR=0.001, URIBL_DBL_REDIR=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aOqIs6OftnCJ for <tap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm33.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm33.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.229.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485791A0B9C for <tap@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm33.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Sep 2014 19:57:41 -0000
Received: from [98.138.101.130] by nm33.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Sep 2014 19:54:48 -0000
Received: from [98.138.87.3] by tm18.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Sep 2014 19:54:48 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Sep 2014 19:54:48 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 393628.90302.bm@omp1003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 99560 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Sep 2014 19:54:48 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1410983688; bh=vNx6T2dl5+RzNoda9AtsCZ8kQgF4/6CKmaeuRnllCNo=; h=References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WVh48LqqPXYQMF0Tvy7PEu7Xh9EF074U0NwYifT822qelk5ZmVnDmgCGPHm7bzUod0hA0+yD34j3gJJyuYeF0mPHpoRYAv5Cl1+6BTYF9/crwNQKZ1xEqDGNmjY6TQEqH82hdbSKWmhof1u07mJicT7n4wqMrOMJg7+dvlDREDY=
X-YMail-OSG: 66VnqyoVM1lh5bgBle8eESHqFC_aF3U1cXkTwbpo0JbBROZ yzKg6lkfqJhZZNE3d8B3QK.buE8poXwUMOyIkAV_pIpv5fhE6
Received: from [2.6.227.184] by web126102.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:54:47 PDT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, KEFtIEkgdGhlIGxhc3QgcGVyc29uIG9uIHRoZSBwbGFuZXQgd2hvIHVzZXMgWWFob28hIE1haWw_IEkgdXNlIGl0IGJlY2F1c2UgaXQncyBzbyBtdWNoIG9mIGEgcGFpbiB0byBjaGFuZ2UgdGhlIGRhbW5lZCB0aGluZywgYnV0IGl0LCBhZ2FpbiwgY29ycnVwdGVkIHRoZSBmb3JtYXR0aW5nIG9uIG15IG1haWwgbWVzc2FnZS4gUmVzZW5kaW5nIHRoZSBncmFtbWFyIGluIGhvcGVzIHRoYXQgaXQgY29tZXMgdGhyb3VnaCBPSyB0aGlzIHRpbWUpCgp0YXAgICAgICAgICAgICA6Oj0gdmVyc2lvbj8geyBjb21tZW4BMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.696
References: <CAP4gcszybVr5Hw3mg=uTi8tqpA3wEVwo=zf2876RWhy_CmozZw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHhgV8jr6ZnsfUkpFC4OL0AwRX-aen7v-7KjcN3e0_19s7steg@mail.gmail.com> <1410980929.82809.YahooMailNeo@web126106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1410983578.9887.YahooMailNeo@web126103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <1410983687.83680.YahooMailNeo@web126102.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:54:47 -0700
From: Ovid <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com>
To: Ovid <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com>, Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com>, Andrew de Andrade <andrew@deandrade.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <1410983578.9887.YahooMailNeo@web126103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1923879097-741173955-1410983687=:83680"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tap/V9RMsfnUoWF_BWGhk96AOdvzkI8
Cc: "tap@ietf.org" <tap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tap] RFC Status?
X-BeenThere: tap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ovid <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com>
List-Id: Test Anything Protocol WG discussions <tap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tap/>
List-Post: <mailto:tap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:57:47 -0000
(Am I the last person on the planet who uses Yahoo! Mail? I use it because it's so much of a pain to change the damned thing, but it, again, corrupted the formatting on my mail message. Resending the grammar in hopes that it comes through OK this time) tap ::= version? { comment | unknown } leading_plan lines | lines trailing_plan {comment} version ::= 'TAP version ' positiveInteger {positiveInteger} "\n" leading_plan ::= plan skip_directive? "\n" trailing_plan ::= plan "\n" plan ::= '1..' nonNegativeInteger line ::= (comment | test | subtest | unknown | bailout ) "\n" subtest ::= ( ' ' version )? ( ' ' plan subtest_line { subtest_line } | subtest_line { subtest_line } ' ' plan ) test subtest_line ::= ' ' line test ::= status positiveInteger? description? directive? status ::= 'not '? 'ok ' description ::= (character - (digit | '#')) {character - '#'} directive ::= todo_directive | skip_directive todo_directive ::= hash_mark 'TODO' ' ' {character} skip_directive ::= hash_mark 'SKIP' ' ' {character} comment ::= hash_mark {character} hash_mark ::= '#' {' '} bailout ::= 'Bail out!' {character} unknown ::= { (character - "\n") } (* POSIX character classes and other terminals *) digit ::= [:digit:] character ::= ([:print:] - "\n") positiveInteger ::= ( digit - '0' ) {digit} nonNegativeInteger ::= digit {digit} Best, Ovid -- IT consulting, training, international recruiting http://www.allaroundtheworld.fr/. Buy my book! - http://bit.ly/beginning_perl Live and work overseas - http://www.overseas-exile.com/
- [tap] RFC Status? Andrew de Andrade
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Gaurav Vaidya
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Bruno P. Kinoshita
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Andrew de Andrade
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Bruno P. Kinoshita
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Andrew de Andrade
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Ovid
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Ovid
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Bruno P. Kinoshita
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Jonathan Kingston
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Andrew de Andrade
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Bruno P. Kinoshita
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Jonathan Kingston
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Salve J Nilsen
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Bruno P. Kinoshita
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Ovid
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Andrew de Andrade
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Ovid
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Andrew de Andrade
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Andrew de Andrade
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Gaurav Vaidya
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Leon Timmermans
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Ovid
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Leon Timmermans
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Andrew de Andrade
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Ovid
- [tap] Valids subtests (was: RFC Status?) Bruno P. Kinoshita
- Re: [tap] Valids subtests (was: RFC Status?) Ovid
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Ovid
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Ovid
- Re: [tap] Valids subtests (was: RFC Status?) Bruno P. Kinoshita
- Re: [tap] Valids subtests (was: RFC Status?) Ovid
- Re: [tap] Valids subtests (was: RFC Status?) Ovid
- Re: [tap] Valids subtests (was: RFC Status?) Bruno P. Kinoshita
- Re: [tap] Valids subtests (was: RFC Status?) Ovid
- Re: [tap] Valids subtests (was: RFC Status?) Bruno P. Kinoshita
- Re: [tap] Valids subtests (was: RFC Status?) Andrew Rodland
- Re: [tap] Valids subtests (was: RFC Status?) Ovid
- Re: [tap] Valids subtests (was: RFC Status?) Bruno P. Kinoshita
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Steffen Schwigon
- Re: [tap] Valids subtests (was: RFC Status?) Andrew Rodland
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Leon Timmermans
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Leon Timmermans
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Steffen Schwigon
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Leon Timmermans
- Re: [tap] RFC Status? Leon Timmermans