IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Taps] agenda planning for chicago

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Fri, 23 December 2016 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D70129498 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:16:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gSTzR-5tGkTY for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out01.uio.no (mail-out01.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4881A129422 for <taps@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29]) by mail-out01.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1cKETW-0002pa-52 for taps@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:16:46 +0100
Received: from 213-147-160-96.nat.highway.bob.at ([213.147.160.96] helo=[192.168.0.102]) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user michawe (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1cKETV-0000oN-CU; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:16:46 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <F9D747AA-C8FB-489C-A925-4483DA31E4B1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:16:41 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EACEF337-C43A-4D08-8262-185C9970D38A@ifi.uio.no>
References: <F9D747AA-C8FB-489C-A925-4483DA31E4B1@gmail.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
X-UiO-SPF-Received:
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 4 msgs/h 2 sum rcpts/h 5 sum msgs/h 2 total rcpts 50246 max rcpts/h 54 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 8525D8CE89D72BEB1AA988296706F268EBCDF1E4
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 213.147.160.96 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 1 max/h 1 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/50_oq0C4ZdaWecAw-vHIQyQUoc0>
Cc: "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Taps] agenda planning for chicago
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Transport Services <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:16:50 -0000

Hi,

We NEATers would love to give the presentation that was dropped the last time.
Other news from my / our side:
- getting closer to the finish line with the -usage draft: quite a lot of updates already done, one major one due early Jan, then we want to submit…
- some ideas (thanks to everyone for input at the last meeting! that was helpful!) for the minset draft, it’s bound to change quite a bit and hopefully provoke an interesting discussion; for now, the plan is to also finish that off fast, i.e. maybe in january…

cheers
Michael


> On Dec 21, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The secretariat has issued the call for wg sessions.  It would be helpful if we had an early idea of the agenda for a TAPS meeting in March.  Should we try again to get in the talks on post-sockets and NEAT?  Are there any other implementation projects that would like to present?  Any other topics to discuss?
> 
> —aaron
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> Taps@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email