IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Taps] agenda planning for chicago

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Thu, 23 February 2017 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FEA129E13 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:55:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kBZRRFu1n5IQ for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:55:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out02.uio.no (mail-out02.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:8210::71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 292CE129688 for <taps@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:55:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-mx3.uio.no ([129.240.10.44]) by mail-out02.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1cgpB4-0005RD-VQ for taps@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:55:06 +0100
Received: from [185.81.138.27] (helo=[192.168.1.171]) by mail-mx3.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user michawe (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1cgpB4-0002lX-EB; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:55:06 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <4A670EAC-538D-46D2-A6B7-CFFA1839D409@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:55:10 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6228C73C-9EA2-4AAA-AE53-5CE386EBC5CA@ifi.uio.no>
References: <F9D747AA-C8FB-489C-A925-4483DA31E4B1@gmail.com> <EACEF337-C43A-4D08-8262-185C9970D38A@ifi.uio.no> <A52E30E8-A308-467E-9B03-AB6A3F13EAA4@gmail.com> <401F531F-134E-4B4A-8CC8-21633FAE2926@ifi.uio.no> <4A670EAC-538D-46D2-A6B7-CFFA1839D409@gmail.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx3.uio.no: 185.81.138.27 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=185.81.138.27; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=[192.168.1.171];
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 2 msgs/h 1 sum rcpts/h 3 sum msgs/h 2 total rcpts 52085 max rcpts/h 54 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 200119860C1391F7EEBD080222BCD9F9433737AC
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 185.81.138.27 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 19 max/h 3 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/Mbz22t9G7GTHsORSQ8Yglk_n7Gs>
Cc: "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Taps] agenda planning for chicago
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Transport Services <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:55:11 -0000

> On Feb 22, 2017, at 3:54 PM, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Trimming for focus…
> 
>>> 
>>> What are the key questions TAPS should be focusing on at this meeting?
>>> 
>> I can think of these 3 major questions that appeared to us when we worked on our drafts:
>> 
>> - how do we handle multi-streaming?
>> - how do we handle messaging?
>> - what about message sizes?
> 
> These seem like good discussion topics.  Who would like to lead a short discussion on each?

I’d volunteer for all 3. Priority order:
1. messaging - I’d really like to lead the discussion on this one
2. multi-streaming
3. message sizes  - this one I feel the least secure about.

Cheers,
Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email