Re: [tcpinc] Revised version of TCP-ENO

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 13 August 2015 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BEE1B3BAD for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HkSTW9oz_a_c for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x234.google.com (mail-yk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E38B1B3BA6 for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykfw73 with SMTP id w73so1232203ykf.3 for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rbhc3WVOc87fcRQLRs4VFCxwv+N2o85xpBNcRw+qIVA=; b=NlisMtq6lnqDBi+6CVJKYsF6gIsIwyGjXDzfcK3sxyak5iwrxzREl7ssIu/pFrTY05 KxHype9fAsBY0TzUWIKP8o8OdEI0Z85d90HJ07HSe7ocw3ogLeSZ/Yv49eCy7Pcj41bk UeAACJ4GeJwPb40jPhlB3gBYJwBDKU6RPfRBRSiUQLJs83xQSwbF7NgUESUqvOsFnbUr mD+CzVTP7iBc3blgE833q/PrXOoomhuThUhG9blYFXOBWgy1Bcv9R0UTL5zr3DEmsrQW c+RFoppDggt/lur8//e/nk8hu2RHXMinVnA4CNL1gVhJU2dPcCsr8FkKtQ1uHJb9oP3v Q0WQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.13.233.133 with SMTP id s127mr43356720ywe.154.1439505783495; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.129.22.211 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87bnea7rr6.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>
References: <87pp2vqplu.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CAJU8_nXAHhf6dqqs0gUEGz49bG7YUO1qaGwaLm04+vstPTyfWg@mail.gmail.com> <87h9o4rqwz.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <874mk2kj56.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <CAJU8_nVcDmCw-0KYviJ5GWZL+-YcCg3wLMJqpkuh=iN8RppA+A@mail.gmail.com> <87y4hej2vf.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <87egj67sac.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <87bnea7rr6.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:43:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUF-byT2MH8mrmZJaMY2PTsspWJ8W3wJmddXdgMqGHCkQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: David Mazieres expires 2015-11-11 PST <mazieres-wjynb5u4gffgk9sqdq6mhqy5r2@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/5mmB8-mli85ud1odAWJoHYapYTQ>
Cc: tcpinc <tcpinc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpinc] Revised version of TCP-ENO
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 22:43:05 -0000

On 13 August 2015 at 15:22, David Mazieres
<dm-list-tcpcrypt@scs.stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> * Unless and until applications disclose information about the session
>   ID, all but the first byte MUST be computationally indistinguishable
>   from random bytes to a network eavesdropper.


Don't call out the first byte.  The whole thing is what will matter
here.  As long as two session IDs are indistinguishable from each
other, I think that we're OK.