Re: [tcpinc] 2 days left: Call for adoption for draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno

I support adoption of this draft.

-Ekr

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Eric Smith <eric.smith@kestrel.edu> wrote:

> I support adoption (I am a co-author of the draft).
>
> Thanks,
> -Eric Smith
>
>
> On 9/26/15 1:06 AM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as a quick reminder the adoption call for draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-02
>> ends Monday night!
>>
>> Have a nice weekend!
>> Mirja
>>
>>
>> Am 15.09.2015 um 10:43 schrieb Mirja Kühlewind <
>>> mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to start a call to ask for adoption as working group document of
>>>
>>>         draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-02.
>>>
>>> This is the third revision of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno addressing
>>> feedback
>>> provided on the list over the last couple of weeks. Based on this
>>> feedback and
>>> the thereby indicated interest of the working group in this work, I
>>> believe this document is ready to ask for adoption as a starting point to
>>> work on a tcp
>>> negotiation option (in a separate document for now).
>>>
>>> Please note that as always the adoption of this document does not mean
>>> that we
>>> have to publish it as it is, or publish it at all. The adoption only
>>> means that
>>> the working group is interested in continuing work on this approach now
>>> and that the change rights go over to the working group such that we can
>>> 'enforce'
>>> changes as a group based on consensus.
>>>
>>> Please indicate until
>>>
>>>         Monday, Sep 28, 2015
>>>
>>> if you support the adoption of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-02 as working
>>> group
>>> document of not.
>>>
>>> As the chair I consider draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno in scope for the
>>> charter. To
>>> adopt draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno it is necessary that I see enough
>>> interest and
>>> energy in the working group to follow on with this work. Therefore
>>> please simply indicate if you support this work. If you don't support this
>>> work, I as a chair would be grateful, if you could provide some reasoning
>>> for this. If there is enough energy to work on this document, I would only
>>> consider strong technical flaws or any comments that show that this work
>>> would be harmful for the goals of the working group as a reason to not
>>> adopt the document.
>>>
>>> Thanks to all!
>>> Mirja
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tcpinc mailing list
>>> Tcpinc@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tcpinc mailing list
>> Tcpinc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tcpinc mailing list
> Tcpinc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
>