IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] draft IETF 72 meeting notes

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Wed, 06 August 2008 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2313A6BE0; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5333A68BC for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v3MRcy8YPOEe for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx03.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184C63A6BDA for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m76BTK09026604; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:29:44 +0300
Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.23]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:29:19 +0300
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:29:13 +0300
Received: from [192.168.1.116] ([10.241.184.208]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:29:13 +0300
Message-Id: <8558B862-CB5D-47A6-A7B4-8B08B5910423@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: ext Mahesh Jethanandani <mahesh@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489201AE.1080706@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926)
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:29:07 +0300
References: <B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E099186@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov> <489201AE.1080706@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Aug 2008 11:29:13.0989 (UTC) FILETIME=[A76A3350:01C8F7B7]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft IETF 72 meeting notes
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

On 2008-7-31, at 21:17, ext Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>> Lars: if I was chair calling consensus - FAIL - don't adopt it as  
>> WG item. Call on WG for proposed std failed.
>>
> In offline discussion with Lars and others it was clear there was  
> confusion about which draft was being requested for WG item. Yes,  
> the original persist draft had not been accepted by WG. On  
> suggestion by the chairs (Mark and Ted at that time)  a short  
> information draft describing just the sender behavior was written  
> and presented in the meeting. It is that draft which is being  
> requested for adoption by WG.
>
> Lars, I hope I have captured the spirit of the discussion.

This is correct - I was confused as to which draft we were discussing.  
Sorry. Disregard my statement.

Lars
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email