Re: [tcpm] draft IETF 72 meeting notes

Mahesh Jethanandani <> Thu, 31 July 2008 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from [] (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A83028C27A; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7792128C271 for <>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.108
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.490, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bKn51b3ouIAd for <>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAAA28C28B for <>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.31,287,1215388800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="60046336"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2008 18:17:20 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6VIHKHF026298; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:17:20 -0700
Received: from [] ([]) by (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6VIHITO004529; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:17:19 GMT
Message-ID: <>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:17:18 -0700
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <>
Organization: Cisco Systems Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]" <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=3670; t=1217528240; x=1218392240; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;;; z=From:=20Mahesh=20Jethanandani=20<> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[tcpm]=20draft=20IETF=2072=20meeting=20 notes |Sender:=20; bh=Jmo1oAX+L1GpPZlWjgcP/cKErhKu18aXYYT3+ynBK5Q=; b=Jo0hgKf+LkELdqW7ZYijEHS6rb51Kk6PuDxoq6M+InoEGHkxAg2zx11G5B 3GhnijIg4y41CJXJTj168xAH/XL5dFSvTLPeW1k2ZJQj3McVWqwtNq7zPO34 k7H6gzaXAUvgRowYNDc5Rf1IPhP2ecmbQBDL95toeClETQoIEZ7+Y=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1;; dkim=pass ( sig from verified; );
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft IETF 72 meeting notes
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1032333487=="

Thanks Lloyd for taking the notes. An addendum to the meeting notes is 
noted inline.

Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ] wrote:
> TCPMers: here are the draft meeting notes from today.  Please report 
> any corrections or clarifications out to the chairs so that we can fix 
> them for the final copy.  Thanks in advance!
> Thanks to Lloyd Wood for taking these notes even among some of the 
> fast discussions; I believe it will be very difficult to convince him 
> to take notes for us again :).
<pasting the relevant section>
> Wes: I had understanding that WG had not accepted this, but easier to get just a clarification (informational) accepted by the WG.
> Lars: if I was chair calling consensus - FAIL - don't adopt it as WG item. Call on WG for proposed std failed.
In offline discussion with Lars and others it was clear there was 
confusion about which draft was being requested for WG item. Yes, the 
original persist draft had not been accepted by WG. On suggestion by the 
chairs (Mark and Ted at that time)  a short information draft describing 
just the sender behavior was written and presented in the meeting. It is 
that draft which is being requested for adoption by WG.

Lars, I hope I have captured the spirit of the discussion.

-- mahesh
tcpm mailing list