Re: [tcpm] [tsvwg] draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-04: flipped exponents in the AVG_W_cubic formulas?

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 07 September 2021 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2DC3A0408; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 07:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UqWYjCCtOYEJ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 07:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FA33A0402; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 07:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:dda5:4290:1153:a43b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 850AB600373; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:02:16 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1631023336; bh=RRkQdyKH8CoBEWWwPDJgw4FSUgpLd93fLB980IzLvVY=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=wLeJXZamAZf0EcTiMEGwoW1puyWaxbSdnCdKb+fv0e/XvZuyBSXIqm8eyoAptGJZ5 GqeqEnTvcjuenJGBdjEwELRRS0mNupTuBFXgoBiAukQ0eDeKr0L76i9ET8bqgXU+ZC WV1N5TdqHi15JR3OClbqZDsG2D6/ou4KkNAWgjsg=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <8832563E-711C-449E-8DE4-55DF8A90FF3C@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CC8DE397-3357-4451-A3A0-EB74247050DB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:02:15 +0300
In-Reply-To: <e8754802-d55a-f232-84ba-07739bb7af83@bobbriscoe.net>
Cc: Lisong Xu <xu@unl.edu>, draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis@ietf.org, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
To: Bob Briscoe <in@bobbriscoe.net>
References: <SN6PR08MB393396B451F8CD0A6F188DD3DACF9@SN6PR08MB3933.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <46E0F892-C3F4-4745-A19C-EFB4773FFD66@eggert.org> <e8754802-d55a-f232-84ba-07739bb7af83@bobbriscoe.net>
X-MailScanner-ID: 850AB600373.ADECA
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/0lH51KLgRU_lF1u59iPH_on1vHA>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [tsvwg] draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc8312bis-04: flipped exponents in the AVG_W_cubic formulas?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 14:02:36 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-9-7, at 16:13, Bob Briscoe <in@bobbriscoe.net> wrote:
> [BB] A nit (I wouldn't have bothered saying this if the draft hadn't just become a candidate for a major drains-up following Markku's review).

what gave you that impression? :-)

> FWIW, I prefer the style of formulae as they were in RFC8312.

Noted. So far, I've heard some preference for the change, but that can of course change. I just wished people wouldn't wait until after WGLC to actually send comments :-/

Thanks,
Lars