Re: [tcpm] dctcp

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 12 November 2010 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548393A69A5 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:06:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wq5d4QE-PjJI for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:06:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AE83A697A for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:06:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oACK5qFB016501 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:05:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4CDD9E20.8030308@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:05:52 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
References: <5FDC413D5FA246468C200652D63E627A0B65CA86@LDCMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <5FDC413D5FA246468C200652D63E627A0B65CA86@LDCMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com>, tcpm <tcpm@ietf.org>, Andrew McGregor <andrewmcgr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] dctcp
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:06:45 -0000

On 11/11/2010 3:51 AM, Scheffenegger, Richard wrote:
...
> Reading the TSVAREA material, it was also pointed out (storage teaser -
> NFSv4, iSCSI) that TCPM may need to look closer at datacenter
> environments rather soon.

Tuning TCP for private networks (i.e., not using the Internet, or 
competing with Internet flows) seems out of scope for TCPM.

It might not even be relevant elsewhere in the IETF, except as an issue 
of common interest. Protocols running over private networks don't need 
to adhere to standards.

Joe