Fwd: Re: [tcpm] Re: draft-ietf-tcpm-ecnsyn-03.txt backwards compatibility

Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Fri, 04 January 2008 18:13 UTC

Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAr3I-0000IB-O5; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:13:52 -0500
Received: from tcpm by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JAr3H-0000I0-EA for tcpm-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:13:51 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAr3H-0000Hr-4H for tcpm@ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:13:51 -0500
Received: from smtp2.smtp.bt.com ([217.32.164.150]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAr3E-0000gz-UP for tcpm@ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:13:51 -0500
Received: from i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.71]) by smtp2.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:13:48 +0000
Received: from cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.100.81]) by i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:13:47 +0000
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1199470425800; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:13:45 +0000
Received: from mut.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.215.130.87]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m04IDQCG008957; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:13:28 GMT
Message-Id: <200801041813.m04IDQCG008957@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:13:38 +0000
To: mallman@icir.org
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
Subject: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] Re: draft-ietf-tcpm-ecnsyn-03.txt backwards compatibility
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: -1.36 () ALL_TRUSTED
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jan 2008 18:13:47.0918 (UTC) FILETIME=[8CFD92E0:01C84EFD]
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: Aleksandar Kuzmanovic <akuzma@northwestern.edu>, "K. K. Ramakrishnan" <kkrama@research.att.com>, Amit Mondal <a-mondal@northwestern.edu>, tcpm@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

Mark,

The draft talks of itself as "a modification to RFC 3168". Will ECN+ 
be marked as "UPDATES RFC3168" in the RFC index?

At least that will help ensure anyone who implements based on the RFC 
index will not have a choice between RFC3168 and ECN+


Bob





____________________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe, <bob.briscoe@bt.com>      Networks Research Centre, BT Research
B54/77 Adastral Park,Martlesham Heath,Ipswich,IP5 3RE,UK.    +44 1473 645196 




_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm