Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht?

Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com> Fri, 25 June 2010 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <hkchu@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7733A687D for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MaBf-0PXk5W6 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FFA3A6837 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.81]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o5PJiaSh019664 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:44:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1277495077; bh=/RIp3G2YLiixNBlDelAedUA74Iw=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QnzOiYjgOtp7sgdk1ATloab0kwc4AkU5U1CsS/nSlswhb7NChW0944B94+FClvkcw KnBydxj3zzlVT+U5SDiXw==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; b=Ne+/9j5FD2uXm2+bSTKTlwYY6vDA8aqh8nMvU6p4ZH1US5RpHcf6qyuj/boh/Dt8V 9bXX8s0Sayudi4BgQvj5A==
Received: from qwd7 (qwd7.prod.google.com [10.241.193.199]) by wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o5PJiZpT008289 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:44:36 -0700
Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so1244896qwd.16 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.88.21 with SMTP id y21mr984456qal.217.1277495075265; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.78.25 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB4810873BDA@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
References: <AANLkTilUogjoOVRKiFSQdfTt2xdSZEPQBVvcABbCs6Rc@mail.gmail.com> <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB4810873BDA@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:44:35 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTilM7RXZ0Mh9k3es5ZbBzHWXrreUz9BFgbL8l-Rv@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>
To: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:44:32 -0000

Hi Wes,

How about other proposals that are still waiting to get on the WG agenda?
(http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hkchu-tcpm-initcwnd-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-paxson-tcpm-rfc2988bis-00.txt)

Since our "Increasing TCP's Initial Window" proposal in Anaheim, we've done
more experiments and have a lot more data to present. We've also been hard
pressed to make forward progress. I was hoping to meet you and many others
f2f in Maastricht to discuss our data. It looks like the alternative
is ICCRG. (A request for presentation slots has been sent to ICCRG.)

Thanks,

Jerry

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC
AEROSPACE CORP] <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> >Jerry Chu
> >Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 7:57 PM
> >To: tcpm@ietf.org
> >Subject: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht?
> >
> >Just saw the draft agenda but did not see tcpm? Are we not meeting at
> >Maastricht?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Jerry
> >
>
> Hi Jerry, we originally submitted a request for a meeting slot, but
> withdrew it in the last couple days after looking at a few things,
> including:
>
> - much of our work is in the phase where it's nearing completion
> - among the active WG documents, tcp-security is the main one that
>  could use face-time, but the editor can't make it to Maastricht
> - availability of webex to IETF WGs seemed like a good way to make
>  progress on tcp-security and other potential new documents
> - we had seen reports that the agenda slots were heavily over-requested
>  for Maastricht
> - both WG chairs were having difficulty scheduling Maastricht travel
>
> So, with the combination of those factors, we decided it would be
> more beneficial to setup a webex to work on tcp-security, at least,
> and use the mailing list to close out any issues on the other documents.
> I hope that makes sense; I had planned on communicating it to the list
> in the next couple days, but your question pushed it out today :).
>
> --
> Wes Eddy
> MTI Systems