Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht?

Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com> Fri, 25 June 2010 19:44 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; b=Ne+/9j5FD2uXm2+bSTKTlwYY6vDA8aqh8nMvU6p4ZH1US5RpHcf6qyuj/boh/Dt8V 9bXX8s0Sayudi4BgQvj5A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB4810873BDA@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
References: <AANLkTilUogjoOVRKiFSQdfTt2xdSZEPQBVvcABbCs6Rc@mail.gmail.com> <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB4810873BDA@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:44:35 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTilM7RXZ0Mh9k3es5ZbBzHWXrreUz9BFgbL8l-Rv@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>
To: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht?
Precedence: list

Hi Wes,

How about other proposals that are still waiting to get on the WG agenda?
(http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hkchu-tcpm-initcwnd-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-paxson-tcpm-rfc2988bis-00.txt)

Since our "Increasing TCP's Initial Window" proposal in Anaheim, we've done
more experiments and have a lot more data to present. We've also been hard
pressed to make forward progress. I was hoping to meet you and many others
f2f in Maastricht to discuss our data. It looks like the alternative
is ICCRG. (A request for presentation slots has been sent to ICCRG.)

Thanks,

Jerry

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC
AEROSPACE CORP] <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> >Jerry Chu
> >Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 7:57 PM
> >To: tcpm@ietf.org
> >Subject: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht?
> >
> >Just saw the draft agenda but did not see tcpm? Are we not meeting at
> >Maastricht?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Jerry
> >
>
> Hi Jerry, we originally submitted a request for a meeting slot, but
> withdrew it in the last couple days after looking at a few things,
> including:
>
> - much of our work is in the phase where it's nearing completion
> - among the active WG documents, tcp-security is the main one that
>  could use face-time, but the editor can't make it to Maastricht
> - availability of webex to IETF WGs seemed like a good way to make
>  progress on tcp-security and other potential new documents
> - we had seen reports that the agenda slots were heavily over-requested
>  for Maastricht
> - both WG chairs were having difficulty scheduling Maastricht travel
>
> So, with the combination of those factors, we decided it would be
> more beneficial to setup a webex to work on tcp-security, at least,
> and use the mailing list to close out any issues on the other documents.
> I hope that makes sense; I had planned on communicating it to the list
> in the next couple days, but your question pushed it out today :).
>
> --
> Wes Eddy
> MTI Systems

[tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht? Jerry Chu
Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht? Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht? Jerry Chu
Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht? Joe Touch
Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht? Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht? Jerry Chu
Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht? Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht? Lars Eggert