Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht?

"Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <> Fri, 25 June 2010 12:14 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A23A3A6981 for <>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.866
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.866 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.867, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aCHEfHQ8hhRU for <>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AAC3A685C for <>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAA7A80D0; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 07:14:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5PCENjm020897; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 07:14:23 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 07:14:23 -0500
From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <>
To: Jerry Chu <>, "" <>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 07:14:21 -0500
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht?
Thread-Index: AcsT+Pn6nhthJrNjRHW/ASpHj8HRoQAZu3+A
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2010-06-25_06:2010-02-06, 2010-06-25, 2010-06-24 signatures=0
Subject: Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:14:16 -0000

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [] On Behalf Of
>Jerry Chu
>Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 7:57 PM
>Subject: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht?
>Just saw the draft agenda but did not see tcpm? Are we not meeting at

Hi Jerry, we originally submitted a request for a meeting slot, but
withdrew it in the last couple days after looking at a few things,

- much of our work is in the phase where it's nearing completion
- among the active WG documents, tcp-security is the main one that
  could use face-time, but the editor can't make it to Maastricht
- availability of webex to IETF WGs seemed like a good way to make
  progress on tcp-security and other potential new documents
- we had seen reports that the agenda slots were heavily over-requested
  for Maastricht
- both WG chairs were having difficulty scheduling Maastricht travel

So, with the combination of those factors, we decided it would be
more beneficial to setup a webex to work on tcp-security, at least,
and use the mailing list to close out any issues on the other documents.
I hope that makes sense; I had planned on communicating it to the list
in the next couple days, but your question pushed it out today :).

Wes Eddy
MTI Systems