Re: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht?

["Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <[e-mail]>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
>Jerry Chu
>Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 7:57 PM
>To: [e-mail]
>Subject: [tcpm] no meeting at Maastricht?
>
>Just saw the draft agenda but did not see tcpm? Are we not meeting at
>Maastricht?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jerry
>

Hi Jerry, we originally submitted a request for a meeting slot, but
withdrew it in the last couple days after looking at a few things,
including:

- much of our work is in the phase where it's nearing completion
- among the active WG documents, tcp-security is the main one that
  could use face-time, but the editor can't make it to Maastricht
- availability of webex to IETF WGs seemed like a good way to make
  progress on tcp-security and other potential new documents
- we had seen reports that the agenda slots were heavily over-requested
  for Maastricht
- both WG chairs were having difficulty scheduling Maastricht travel

So, with the combination of those factors, we decided it would be
more beneficial to setup a webex to work on tcp-security, at least,
and use the mailing list to close out any issues on the other documents.
I hope that makes sense; I had planned on communicating it to the list
in the next couple days, but your question pushed it out today :).

--
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems