[tcpm] [Errata Rejected] RFC7323 (6798)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 13 May 2022 21:13 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B34C1850D8; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bEpm7mk2VcGL; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32BD3C15E403; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 02B816A9C8; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: yaakovjstein@gmail.com, david.borman@quantum.com, braden@isi.edu, vanj@google.com, rs@netapp.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: martin.h.duke@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, tcpm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220513211319.02B816A9C8@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 14:13:18 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/4fD5XSq2sSZvJK_ax9kUFYSUBfc>
Subject: [tcpm] [Errata Rejected] RFC7323 (6798)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 21:13:23 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7323, "TCP Extensions for High Performance". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6798 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Yaakov Stein <yaakovjstein@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2021-12-26 Rejected by: Martin Duke (IESG) Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- The Timestamps option may appear in any data or <ACK> segment, adding The timestamp clock may be derived from a system clock that is A random offset may be added to the timestamp clock on a per- Corrected Text -------------- The Timestamps option MAY appear in any data or <ACK> segment, adding The timestamp clock MAY be derived from a system clock that is A random offset MAY be added to the timestamp clock on a per- Notes ----- several "MAY"s were incorrectly written as non RFC 2119 "may"s --VERIFIER NOTES-- These examples are non-normative. The first is explanatory, and the other two are examples of ways to meet the requirement. -------------------------------------- RFC7323 (draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-21) -------------------------------------- Title : TCP Extensions for High Performance Publication Date : September 2014 Author(s) : D. Borman, B. Braden, V. Jacobson, R. Scheffenegger, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [tcpm] [Errata Rejected] RFC7323 (6798) RFC Errata System