IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] WG item adoption for draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-06

Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 03 August 2020 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA263A0C62 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 01:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dZwj7Crfn52M for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 01:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 664C23A0C61 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 01:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id c19so3266925wmd.1 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 01:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QM+DmgYOXVymzymMwcz+ajU3K6rtL67KqDGD7Yeo6cg=; b=pZIqqbbGuA3HOfvkykTfTC3toms4q5AByapV2hynsHx9kN5HFYYQr1RtAJJXJPbvEg azvDdhd5wiI04S0nrLXCWT35ZnYBp30WVKWiJPAPf/JMqUSV59xH7WIw7TsYnXnPUW+I yd5fxKTZeVqroK/VgB1URYfnEWWSs0pQbXYZhWgbthg/pGD6vxTb3LqA935U0274eIaZ yezf+Bwv2fga5vBTpVnrE8GQIQyeke5EtQMoRZAbvHZs/p+2D5MH+XZnJ5eDziRU2rlC P8UVeDJpqO57eKdzqPp4Yl9/56CmIavoR2gfIzflAsMW4rHPSt2sFzdX/mYay6TKSQFI JpKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QM+DmgYOXVymzymMwcz+ajU3K6rtL67KqDGD7Yeo6cg=; b=m0970DfZ2CGCGyb6CuFILAu0EP1z1bxdsIRxm7x6VvcWW0sGqeGglcUOOxeL2SCmWy YmNIAFq9KT/jw55DR1V96gj9bANlFTqAN4gTEYhJTgwXa5mjXq40yM41mn8mzdZi0kbW 9ceggBFyYe19/anD1pB+NwTNowDtshaPNj4S/eEaIL0eoSrkJCJwrDCjUJI0ID0yi+j6 SmuQouj5x5o5fCRpjfTfkNuImOUUfw5wZNb46GMXShrBzFTNN2WpWf1JZxvxlYoyoAqT ycW70HeAnhHV9Q265tKNsJkr3t/mHZaqSBIsmQkwnfnI+cb9/HSPiwInMhd5aPXjCnYP AOIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mvuqOgyMVi0Nftdd6xKTW6CBgDANKHxaoMhxgHfSFuVbAsIQ3 FFtNr/8YjpmDdM9BcUkT6YO0oFfA31E3V6SVhwQ7q9Py
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSH/yUhNs7mi/n3RYvcI0jdcEWqth8AJr9ZwO0Hk4LQL/ZBUKj1Nuceu0zFhdjD28oBFJHuYJ62UiraFRvHH4=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7918:: with SMTP id l24mr14156120wme.132.1596441882684; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 01:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 01:04:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAK044QtbiPFsifYyuKXpjeefRhdGoHEYNk421ayJ12YiA-F1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000526f9f05abf4972e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/4vNnPdv2pO-tbGotiUtx5x0ip_4>
Subject: [tcpm] WG item adoption for draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-06
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:04:45 -0000

Hi,

The chairs has been discussing how to proceed draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-06
after the WG meeting.
The results of the hum were a bit weak to see clear consensus although
there was slightly strong hum for adoption.
Also, there seems to be some confusions during the adoption call. (I'm
sorry for the clumsiness of using the tool)
In order for this, we would like to seek the additional feedback from the
community on the following points.

1: If you want to add your hum to the call because you didn't at the
meeting for some reasons or if you want to change your hum, please let the
chairs know.
2: if you hummed for not adopting the draft, please share your opinion.
This will be a very helpful input for us.

We'll appreciate your cooperation.
Thanks,
--
Yoshi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email