Re: [tcpm] proposal for the next WG session
"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Mon, 30 July 2012 21:12 UTC
Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D337821F8559 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KCeRRfLharQc for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17E521F850B for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,681,1336374000"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="669794026"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2012 14:12:08 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.77.34]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q6ULC8Xt019322; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.13]) by vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.34]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:12:07 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "Scharf, Michael (Michael)" <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] proposal for the next WG session
Thread-Index: AQHNboEP1Py85f0+vkWsN7lVIbOrZpdCnD6AgAAZOYCAABLRAA==
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:12:07 +0000
Message-ID: <9FDF3D2D-2AE5-46DE-BA6E-2A98CACC7521@netapp.com>
References: <4EEB89AE-6450-48DC-9737-973D698665D2@netapp.com> <47336CE2-1CD2-48CE-99A2-84726F7B3400@tzi.org> <2A886F9088894347A3BE0CC5B7A85F3E891A9BBCFD@FRMRSSXCHMBSE3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <2A886F9088894347A3BE0CC5B7A85F3E891A9BBCFD@FRMRSSXCHMBSE3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.116]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D54FFF0E-3581-4C73-9A72-5B9C59430768"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] proposal for the next WG session
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:12:13 -0000
On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:04, "Scharf, Michael (Michael)" <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > TCPM has been open in the past for short heads-up presentations regarding work that is clearly outside the scope of TCPM (another recent example was tcpcrypt), to make people aware of such work, if they don't read all drafts that have "TCP" in the title... > > This practice can be changed, of course. I don't want to change that. IFF we have the time. Heads-ups should go to the list, and be session-wise be scheduled in the "if time permits" category. We had to cut so many important discussions short today that I'm grumpy. Lars
- [tcpm] proposal for the next WG session Eggert, Lars
- Re: [tcpm] proposal for the next WG session Carsten Bormann
- Re: [tcpm] proposal for the next WG session Scharf, Michael (Michael)
- Re: [tcpm] proposal for the next WG session Eggert, Lars