[tcpm] proposal for the next WG session
"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Mon, 30 July 2012 18:28 UTC
Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A801F21F86D4 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.147, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g8yKrZl0qC8E for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B127821F86D3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,681,1336374000"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="669747057"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2012 11:28:06 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.76.239]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q6UIS618028462 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.13]) by vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.239]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:28:05 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: proposal for the next WG session
Thread-Index: AQHNboEP1Py85f0+vkWsN7lVIbOrZg==
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:28:05 +0000
Message-ID: <4EEB89AE-6450-48DC-9737-973D698665D2@netapp.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.116]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5862B851-1DA7-4125-B04E-FD11EA92AA6D"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [tcpm] proposal for the next WG session
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:28:07 -0000
Hi, I don't like that we have no time to discuss very many of the presentations today. For the next sessions, can we limit the amount of presentations and set aside more time for discussion? My proposal would be that no contribution (ID or slide set) gets presentation time without having seen some minimum discussion on the list first, to be judged by the chairs. Lars
- [tcpm] proposal for the next WG session Eggert, Lars
- Re: [tcpm] proposal for the next WG session Carsten Bormann
- Re: [tcpm] proposal for the next WG session Scharf, Michael (Michael)
- Re: [tcpm] proposal for the next WG session Eggert, Lars