Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Fri, 22 May 2009 03:00 UTC
Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DF03A6D50 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2009 20:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xqliriPl+6lX for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2009 20:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D50B3A6DF4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2009 20:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.18] (event-241.akiba-b.hpcc.jp [192.50.75.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.fit.nokia.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4M328fo086493 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 22 May 2009 06:02:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
Message-Id: <53AC2432-4B39-46FD-8414-F29EC648066C@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <29AE22C3-F03F-48A8-B335-A7C8E0265406@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-20-513634832"; micalg="sha1"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:02:03 +0900
References: <20090402150706.EC83D28C222@core3.amsl.com> <29AE22C3-F03F-48A8-B335-A7C8E0265406@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.194]); Fri, 22 May 2009 06:02:16 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 03:00:42 -0000
Hi, authors, it's been over a month since the IETF last call ended, and I have not seen a document revision or even an attempt at discussing the comments you have received. Please start this discussion and eventually revise the document. Thanks, Lars On 2009-4-17, at 5:11, Eggert Lars (Nokia-NRC/Espoo) wrote: > Hi, authors, > > the IETF last call has ended, and it looks like the few comments I've > seen will require some text changes, so I'm placing this document in > the Revised ID Needed state. > > Also: Has the discussion of the comments that Fernando made concluded? > > Lars > > > On 2009-4-2, at 18:07, The IESG wrote: > >> The IESG has received a request from the TCP Maintenance and Minor >> Extensions WG (tcpm) to consider the following document: >> >> - 'Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks ' >> <draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt> as a Proposed Standard >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to >> the >> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-04-16. Exceptionally, >> comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please >> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> The file can be obtained via >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt >> >> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=11735&rfc_flag=0 >> >> The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/421/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tcpm mailing list >> tcpm@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm > > <smime.p7s><ATT00001.txt>
- [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Impr… The IESG
- Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (… Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)
- Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (… Tom Petch
- Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (… Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)
- Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (… Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)
- Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (… Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)