Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13.txt
Greg Skinner <gregskinner0@icloud.com> Fri, 14 June 2019 04:37 UTC
Return-Path: <gregskinner0@icloud.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD35F120139 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=icloud.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MvjOPTykIVWs for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mr85p00im-hyfv06011301.me.com (mr85p00im-hyfv06011301.me.com [17.58.23.184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F5471200B5 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=04042017; t=1560487062; bh=ItLiKJJSgPsb8/yJjKmPIO570ZyGe/4YdRWPxLVQBgw=; h=From:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:To:Message-Id; b=PJVbNM/7SWEktpDnixotE6BwZ7ceuG897tnroE07/kiofBjLlsebe9jf/urCO39EC A+i6dogMV4tEmePM9Zve5nPuK3V2YPRA26aitFbmBpd1yZ+1q0ru2uBwFeAUByi5YX ViPFiZXjlcnGZhq9q9Hagg/n+RmvoUU+SnPT0ncP9yLmicyHiUcOnJoEPECFckRH49 aEVGEW1JWLmygU7BuQEOrlwnViCFBFd1RHDS0c7GmKx88/xuBeTCJYeco3Ri+zha8J D6wo4iLa4F+fC/ljfpjBmb2Miu9pfNaKcGg5U0uVI94z1VMeeV+acaUAxqQYfNKpu9 hSlMAVIGjYhkg==
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (m201-12.dsl.tsoft.com [198.144.201.12]) by mr85p00im-hyfv06011301.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28646580B02 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:37:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: Greg Skinner <gregskinner0@icloud.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8D68DB98-5796-41FB-8CF5-F16C388DFB01"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:37:39 -0700
References: <155961153844.24918.3595391320504211546@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <155961153844.24918.3595391320504211546@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-Id: <DC9EC744-EA00-4A2E-A43C-6E7E2C5DDF99@icloud.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-06-14_03:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=984 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1812120000 definitions=main-1906140038
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/CwaQIppkHRXMG4sdz7MWSREsbjo>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:37:46 -0000
I found a few items while referring to this draft. I hope the feedback will be useful. §3.4: In the sentence "The principle reason for the three-way handshake is to prevent old duplicate connection initiations from causing confusion.” I believe the correct spelling should be “principal”, because it is being used as an adjective. (More information is available from the definition of principal at wordreference.com <https://www.wordreference.com/definition/principal>.) §3.8.6: The phrase “robustness principle” is used, but not cited. While most readers of the draft probably know what it is, others may not. IMO, a citation would be helpful, either from references already in the draft (RFCs 791, 793), or others such as RFC 1958, §3. §7: s/alphebetically/alphabetically/ BR, Greg > On Jun 3, 2019, at 6:25 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG of the IETF. > > Title : Transmission Control Protocol Specification > Author : Wesley M. Eddy > Filename : draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13.txt > Pages : 104 > Date : 2019-06-03 > > Abstract: > This document specifies the Internet's Transmission Control Protocol > (TCP). TCP is an important transport layer protocol in the Internet > stack, and has continuously evolved over decades of use and growth of > the Internet. Over this time, a number of changes have been made to > TCP as it was specified in RFC 793, though these have only been > documented in a piecemeal fashion. This document collects and brings > those changes together with the protocol specification from RFC 793. > This document obsoletes RFC 793, as well as 879, 2873, 6093, 6429, > 6528, and 6691 that updated parts of RFC 793. It updates RFC 1122, > and should be considered as a replacement for the portions of that > document dealing with TCP requirements. It updates RFC 5961 due to a > small clarification in reset handling while in the SYN-RECEIVED > state. > > RFC EDITOR NOTE: If approved for publication as an RFC, this should > be marked additionally as "STD: 7" and replace RFC 793 in that role. > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >
- [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-13.t… internet-drafts
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-… Greg Skinner
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-… Wesley Eddy