[tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2269)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 18 May 2010 16:33 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557023A6A40 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.779
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.779 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.779, BAYES_50=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Upi8yNfrjfj for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBB93A6A9A for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 29C0AE065C; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: mallman@icir.org, vern@icir.org, eblanton@cs.purdue.edu, ietfdbh@comcast.net, lars.eggert@nokia.com, weddy@grc.nasa.gov, david.borman@windriver.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100518162738.29C0AE065C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 09:27:38 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 20 May 2010 08:38:11 -0700
Cc: nmalykh@protocols.ru, tcpm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2269)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 16:33:36 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5681, "TCP Congestion Control". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5681&eid=2269 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@protocols.ru> Section: 7 Original Text ------------- The description of fast retransmit and fast recovery has been clarified, and the use of Limited Transmit [RFC3042] is now recommended. Corrected Text -------------- The description of fast retransmit and fast recovery has been clarified. Notes ----- Really using of Limited Transmit [RFC3042] is not recommended anywhere in RFC 5681. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5681 (draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc2581bis-07) -------------------------------------- Title : TCP Congestion Control Publication Date : September 2009 Author(s) : M. Allman, V. Paxson, E. Blanton Category : DRAFT STANDARD Source : TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2… Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
- [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2269) RFC Errata System
- Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2… Mark Allman
- Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2… Vern Paxson