Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard

"Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com> Fri, 22 May 2009 05:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ananth@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E583A6EE7 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2009 22:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BO0zNN40GUn2 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2009 22:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0873A69B7 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2009 22:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,231,1241395200"; d="scan'208";a="308945178"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 May 2009 05:33:58 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n4M5XwIr002289; Thu, 21 May 2009 22:33:58 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4M5XwFv006229; Fri, 22 May 2009 05:33:58 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.176]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 21 May 2009 22:33:58 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:33:14 -0700
Message-ID: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC58074EEA6E@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <53AC2432-4B39-46FD-8414-F29EC648066C@nokia.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AcnaicEx7z3HtG7FR3ev6lvcNYBaVQAE5IJg
References: <20090402150706.EC83D28C222@core3.amsl.com> <29AE22C3-F03F-48A8-B335-A7C8E0265406@nokia.com> <53AC2432-4B39-46FD-8414-F29EC648066C@nokia.com>
From: "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, tcpm@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 May 2009 05:33:58.0330 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7AC81A0:01C9DA9E]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2763; t=1242970438; x=1243834438; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=ananth@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Anantha=20Ramaiah=20(ananth)=22=20<ananth@cisco .com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[tcpm]=20Last=20Call=3A=20draft-ietf-tc pm-tcpsecure=20(Improving=20TCP's=20=09Robustness=20to=20Bli nd=20In-Window=20Attacks)=20to=20Proposed=20Standard |Sender:=20; bh=VWu0q7St58QIrwOmwcEj40p4opHi76W0ZWaq34E59+8=; b=0KO31KJd65WLAq/J5pCy/XjzSWR3abYDFVSytxdeEueEwThE1jxzbdluzO PD3FgBc4eUoyjUGEwUW3HJ953pu3Zad3j8Tn8d0yH/wKEyBECl49GD139C1I IXDx6L2xIQ;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=ananth@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 05:32:48 -0000

Lars,
   There were some comments by Sandra Murphy which we have had
discussion. I had already responded to Fernando's comments and the
agreed upon comments are being incorporated. 
   That said, I agree that we have been slow in getting the next
revision for which I sincerely apologize, well for a change this time it
is us!  
-Anantha 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert@nokia.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:02 PM
> To: tcpm@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure 
> (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to 
> Proposed Standard
> 
> Hi, authors,
> 
> it's been over a month since the IETF last call ended, and I 
> have not seen a document revision or even an attempt at 
> discussing the comments you have received. Please start this 
> discussion and eventually revise the document.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lars
> 
> On 2009-4-17, at 5:11, Eggert Lars (Nokia-NRC/Espoo) wrote:
> 
> > Hi, authors,
> >
> > the IETF last call has ended, and it looks like the few 
> comments I've 
> > seen will require some text changes, so I'm placing this 
> document in 
> > the Revised ID Needed state.
> >
> > Also: Has the discussion of the comments that Fernando made 
> concluded?
> >
> > Lars
> >
> >
> > On 2009-4-2, at 18:07, The IESG wrote:
> >
> >> The IESG has received a request from the TCP Maintenance and Minor 
> >> Extensions WG (tcpm) to consider the following document:
> >>
> >> - 'Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks '
> >>  <draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt> as a Proposed Standard
> >>
> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, 
> and solicits 
> >> final comments on this action.  Please send substantive 
> comments to 
> >> the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-04-16. Exceptionally, 
> >> comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either 
> case, please 
> >> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow 
> automated sorting.
> >>
> >> The file can be obtained via
> >> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt
> >>
> >>
> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> >> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dT
> >> ag=11735&rfc_flag=0
> >>
> >> The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:
> >>
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/421/
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tcpm mailing list
> >> tcpm@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> >
> > <smime.p7s><ATT00001.txt>
> 
>