Re: [tcpm] tcp-auth-opt issue: header format and alignment
Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Mon, 04 August 2008 17:36 UTC
Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40ED3A6A39; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6663A691F for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.424
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.424 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.175, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VN8RlLU+00wQ for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og108.obsmtp.com (exprod7og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.169]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A793A68E4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.228.6]) by exprod7ob108.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:35:47 PDT
Received: from antipi.jnpr.net ([10.10.2.34]) by p-emsmtp03.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:36:09 -0700
Received: from proton.jnpr.net ([10.10.2.37]) by antipi.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 13:36:07 -0400
Received: from [172.28.13.57] ([172.28.13.57] RDNS failed) by proton.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 13:36:07 -0400
Message-ID: <48973E04.6070400@juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:36:04 -0400
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
References: <4890EFB0.5020301@isi.edu> <396556a20807301557q608ff91er95e46fa8e6167f6c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <396556a20807301557q608ff91er95e46fa8e6167f6c@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Aug 2008 17:36:07.0402 (UTC) FILETIME=[939AF4A0:01C8F658]
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] tcp-auth-opt issue: header format and alignment
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Mine, too! Adam Langley wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote: >> The consensus appears to be emerging that we retain a simple, >> deterministic header format, and leave alignment issues to implementations: > > I thought that KeyID was a clearer name, but either way is fine. > Putting it at the front like this definitely has my vote. > > > AGL > _______________________________________________ tcpm mailing list tcpm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm