IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Adding Acknowledgement Congestion Control to TCP

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Sat, 24 January 2009 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9DE3A6951; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:43:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4ED3A6951 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:43:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.112, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MzZAmYUJXnGK for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:43:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5E33A68A1 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:43:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.44] (pool-71-106-119-240.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.106.119.240]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0OLgioH009642; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:42:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <497B8B54.5060409@isi.edu>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:42:44 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sally Floyd <sallyfloyd@mac.com>
References: <20DE24B1-1A32-44DA-9730-07CE6E3D662A@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <20DE24B1-1A32-44DA-9730-07CE6E3D662A@mac.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: tcpm <tcpm@ietf.org>, David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>, Janardhan Iyengar <janardhan.iyengar@fandm.edu>, Wesley Eddy <weddy@grc.nasa.gov>, David Ros <david.ros@telecom-bretagne.eu>, Andrés Arcia <ae.arcia@telecom-bretagne.eu>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Adding Acknowledgement Congestion Control to TCP
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, Sally,

Sally Floyd wrote:
> We have submitted a new version of our internet-draft on
> "Adding Acknowledgement Congestion Control to TCP",
> draft-floyd-tcpm-ackcc, available at
> "http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-floyd-tcpm-ackcc".
> 
> This draft is an individual submission, and was first presented at
> TCPM in July, 2007.  ("http://www.icir.org/floyd/talks.html").
> Because I am in the process of retiring, and have a number of
> unfinished documents still, I have changed this draft to have an
> intended status of Informational instead of Experimental, and would
> like to see what steps would be necessary to advance this document
> as Informational. 

I would expect there would be higher hurdles for experimental than
informational, no?

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkl7i1QACgkQE5f5cImnZrtYhgCcDz8BNofZFp2Qkb4VjOZWRcup
UYgAoNAXqVunPKjPUEHCF2/VNdxp1bBh
=oSm4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email