IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] new version of 2988bis

"Per Hurtig (work)" <per.hurtig@kau.se> Wed, 22 December 2010 09:14 UTC

Return-Path: <per.hurtig@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620023A69CB for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:14:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AadOvd8KzSxc for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:14:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f43.google.com (mail-fx0-f43.google.com [209.85.161.43]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9873A69AF for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:14:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so4935368fxm.16 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:16:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gv80eDR08HGGROdMiz9uhBOIs+X0kTnJnXbfwDGbWx4=; b=u+zfDXg/QtpIhJq+648mrHTCdbKSWbTIKDeIjJgmCDbMSE8jDUkVKEoGqVE3y+0Bha Rn4FY9nGE2RzOlNzs6t6MNEfdT70UiYyuVgkMWnCMe0l7jhzZDA9NMppbEaPwfGF14Wk kcyReYOHNAjfp5A3+bOCuo4nAI4ojJWWbTWoo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=gGsRatsnhyY5r1IlsaAOyxmTgOSljZkTL5nGmcPMMZ8ne/g9RDDeOgmV0v3LcS1MzC odbw5iolcqt7Ai5vNgAlGOkgGyzUCZgpKMWHGHPJPRu1jR3G2JYip5rnETMTxbc5tJCu 3FFqk5bFQEjzRKcWfXSvkmh3A/FPLC0oycB78=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.85.204 with SMTP id p12mr6956904fal.146.1293009369217; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:16:09 -0800 (PST)
Sender: per.hurtig@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.102.70 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:16:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20101207033356.439642715136@lawyers.icir.org>
References: <20101207033356.439642715136@lawyers.icir.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:16:09 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: a1dAWMEr4zXSKdIkDIxZ-3Wdax8
Message-ID: <AANLkTimTJSGMOuay10krCjJbu6pPnoGFuirz_Q3_tk0F@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Per Hurtig (work)" <per.hurtig@kau.se>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: mallman@icir.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] new version of 2988bis
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:16:26 -0000

Hi all,

we have submitted an I-D that summarizes an alternate way to restart
the TCP/SCTP RTO timer:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hurtig-tcpm-rtorestart-00.txt

The difference between this approach and RFC2988(bis)'s approach is
the way outstanding segments are
considered. We're happy to receive any comments on the draft.


Regards, Per H




On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 04:33, Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> wrote:
>
> Folks-
>
> We posted a new version of the 2988bis I-D today.  It is:
>
>  draft-paxson-tcpm-rfc2988bis-01.txt
>
> The big change is a new set of empirical results that pertain to
> dropping the initial RTO from 3sec to 1sec is now given (along with the
> previous results from Google) in the appendix.  Generally speaking,
> these results show it is pretty safe to drop the initial RTO.
>
> Have a look.  I believe the authors are pretty happy with this document
> at this point.
>
> allman
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email