[tcpm] consensus call: draft-larsen-tsvwg-port-randomization to WG item
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Wed, 12 September 2007 15:39 UTC
Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVUJH-000401-Ah; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:39:23 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVUJF-0003z3-Cy; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:39:21 -0400
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.170] helo=mgw-ext11.nokia.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVUJD-0002B0-UC; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:39:21 -0400
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-ext11.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l8CFd6H9018632; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:39:15 +0300
Received: from esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.33]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:38:45 +0300
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:38:45 +0300
Received: from mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com ([172.21.143.96]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:38:44 +0300
Received: from [172.21.39.198] (esdhcp039198.research.nokia.com [172.21.39.198]) by mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l8CFchfb023671; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:38:43 +0300
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Message-Id: <CE913D4A-891C-4537-9467-D74B0982F587@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:38:38 +0300
To: tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Sep 2007 15:38:44.0211 (UTC) FILETIME=[00750C30:01C7F553]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f66b12316365a3fe519e75911daf28a8
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, draft-larsen-tsvwg-port-randomization@tools.ietf.org, DCCP mailing list <dccp@ietf.org>
Subject: [tcpm] consensus call: draft-larsen-tsvwg-port-randomization to WG item
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1998048857=="
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, regarding http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-larsen-tsvwg-port- randomization, there was quite a bit of discussion around this draft during the summer. My personal take is that I saw more positive than negative comments, but I'd like to confirm this. I'd hence like to start a consensus call on whether we want to take this document to be the basis for a standards-track work item in TSVWG that will recommend a randomization scheme for operating systems allocation of source ports. Because this scheme will cover all our transport protocols, I'm CC'ing the DCCP and TCPM working groups. This consensus call will run for two weeks, until September 28. Please comment on the tsvwg@ietf.org list (reply-to set accordingly), even if you have already commented be on this draft in the past. To make it easy for your chairs, please start your email by choosing ONE of the options below, followed by any detailed comments you'd like to make: (1) TSVWG should take on this work item, with this document as the basis (2) TSVWG should take on this work item, but NOT with this document as the basis (3) TSVWG should NOT take on this work item (4) don't care Thanks, Lars
_______________________________________________ tcpm mailing list tcpm@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm