RE: [tcpm] consensus call: draft-larsen-tsvwg-port-randomization to WGitem
"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Tue, 18 September 2007 21:37 UTC
Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXkl6-0007U9-3K; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:37:28 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXkl4-0007Rl-AS; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:37:26 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXkl3-0000jo-SX; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:37:26 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.20,270,1186383600"; d="scan'208";a="220552824"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2007 14:37:25 -0700
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l8ILbOLK029749; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:37:24 -0700
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.198]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l8ILbO0d029090; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:37:24 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'tsvwg WG' <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <CE913D4A-891C-4537-9467-D74B0982F587@nokia.com>
Subject: RE: [tcpm] consensus call: draft-larsen-tsvwg-port-randomization to WGitem
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:37:24 -0700
Message-ID: <02f001c7fa3c$1a485c00$c6f0200a@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: Acf1UxqO7yEuSj16Rwqj/d8GbbNKcwE6JJLA
In-Reply-To: <CE913D4A-891C-4537-9467-D74B0982F587@nokia.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2184; t=1190151445; x=1191015445; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[tcpm]=20consensus=20call=3A=20draft-larsen-tsvwg-por t-randomization=20to=20WGitem |Sender:=20; bh=L++wPkfS8tpafnjgTK0ZHxIHz43okq7Q5SRg6eq4xKU=; b=BqF7Y00ANx3iI/6C4EVL9dIkPQkHgwc4wVd+qFvDx4exCsPCxKX6GzCpB/Uj3oqPEU+Uc+Zn +hSvu3fSSsXfR4WDgjdKZzCCl48jqZUJMk3Yno/99g0dDk1IcgwskIuX;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3e15cc4fdc61d7bce84032741d11c8e5
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, draft-larsen-tsvwg-port-randomization@tools.ietf.org, 'DCCP mailing list' <dccp@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
I support this document becoming a TSVWG working group item. During its transition to such, I would like the authors to more clearly extend the document's applicability to non-TCP protocols with port numbers. Specifically, the document should include "UDP", "DCCP", and "SCTP" (as well as TCP) in its introduction (and perhaps also in its abstract) so that anyone developing or writing host requirements for those protocols will have a better chance of finding this specification when working on those protocols. -d > -----Original Message----- > From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert@nokia.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 8:39 AM > To: tsvwg WG > Cc: tcpm@ietf.org; > draft-larsen-tsvwg-port-randomization@tools.ietf.org; DCCP > mailing list > Subject: [tcpm] consensus call: > draft-larsen-tsvwg-port-randomization to WGitem > > Hi, > > regarding http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-larsen-tsvwg-port- > randomization, there was quite a bit of discussion around this draft > during the summer. My personal take is that I saw more positive than > negative comments, but I'd like to confirm this. > > I'd hence like to start a consensus call on whether we want to take > this document to be the basis for a standards-track work item in > TSVWG that will recommend a randomization scheme for operating > systems allocation of source ports. Because this scheme will cover > all our transport protocols, I'm CC'ing the DCCP and TCPM working > groups. This consensus call will run for two weeks, until > September 28. > > Please comment on the tsvwg@ietf.org list (reply-to set > accordingly), > even if you have already commented be on this draft in the past. > > To make it easy for your chairs, please start your email by choosing > ONE of the options below, followed by any detailed comments you'd > like to make: > > (1) TSVWG should take on this work item, with this > document as the > basis > (2) TSVWG should take on this work item, but NOT with this > document as the basis > (3) TSVWG should NOT take on this work item > (4) don't care > > Thanks, > Lars > _______________________________________________ tcpm mailing list tcpm@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm