Re: [tcpm] Early assignment of IANA TCP option number for AccECN

Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Mon, 25 July 2022 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A30C13CCE4 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 12:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Kn_-GxnePGM for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 12:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E497C13CCE8 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 12:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:4cbe:18d1:ff99:715f]) (Authenticated sender: lurchi) by drew.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CF357D6E952B; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 21:54:19 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <7eff938c-d123-5bdc-49c0-59eee2451c93@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 21:54:18 +0200
Cc: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>, "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs.ietf@gmx.at>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3A235C74-B9B4-44F6-AAF9-5C75E8EEB6AA@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <5fd201f8-5457-3184-302d-c2f653564647@bobbriscoe.net> <9944A719-2FAF-4138-B1A3-4180454FD030@ericsson.com> <899a549f-fc82-a484-1043-28a151ae138d@bobbriscoe.net> <6032F422-60DE-4AC5-A291-E9A731032FED@ericsson.com> <87bd3248-312b-3d1b-8ba9-d4e3c1cfb1d8@gmx.at> <C4C242D1-B5DD-48A8-BB62-28C524C50F72@lurchi.franken.de> <ade43071-85b1-f29b-87d5-c112f4121cc5@gmx.at> <7eff938c-d123-5bdc-49c0-59eee2451c93@bobbriscoe.net>
To: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/TG4JX6VbY28wafg5JGaJ8MBJCEM>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Early assignment of IANA TCP option number for AccECN
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:54:29 -0000

> On 25. Jul 2022, at 17:31, Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> wrote:
> 
> tcpm, Michael,
> 
> On 25/07/2022 15:08, Scheffenegger, Richard wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Am 25.07.2022 um 16:02 schrieb Michael Tuexen:
>>>> On 25. Jul 2022, at 15:52, Scheffenegger, Richard <rs.ietf@gmx.at> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> As one of the authors of the AccECN draft, which approaches the final
>>>> stages, I wanted to see if there is support to ask IANA for an early
>>>> assignment of the two TCP Option numbers for AccECN.
>>>> 
>>>> The background here is, that the current use of the experimental option
>>>> in Linux (0xACC0 and 0xACC1) is not really documented - the draft only
>>>> mentiones the experimental ID 0xACCE which was in use prior of the
>>>> decision to go with two distinct option numbers.
>>> If I understand the experimental options correctly, you could just use
>>> kind=253, ExID=0xACCE
>>> kind=254, ExID=0xACCE
>>> to distinguish your two option using the assignment already made (for
>>> example the kind=253 for Order 0, kind=254 for Order 1).
>> 
>> Yes, could have :)
>> 
>>> I don't see the ones used by Linux under
>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/tcp-parameters/tcp-parameters.xhtml#tcp-exids 
>> 
>> No. I went to
>> 
>> https://github.com/L4STeam/linux/blob/testing/include/net/tcp.h
>> 
>> to find the currently in use experiment IDs as observed in the interop
>> testing.
> 
> Richard told me that earlier today he asked IANA to document the two exIDs at https://www.iana.org/assignments/tcp-parameters/tcp-parameters.xhtml#tcp-exids
> Which is why I also documented them in the draft update I just sent.
Hi Bob,

in my earlier e-mail I missed this sentence! Thank you very much for documenting
them!

Best regards
Michael
> However, IANA hasn't updated that registry yet, AFAICT.
> 
> 
> Bob
> 
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> However, the implementations between Linux and FreeBSD deviated - Linux
>>>> using two different experimental IDs (see above), while the FreeBSD
>>>> variant differentiated by an additional byte after the experiment ID
>>>> (0xACCE).
>>> I think the draft should describe how to use the experimental options.
>>> 
>>> Best regards
>>> Michael (as an individual)
> 
> -- 
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/
>