IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] Issue with multiple option code points: Re: Early assignment of IANA TCP option number for AccECN

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Tue, 26 July 2022 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945DAC157B42 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.325
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.325 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9nW9EBsVlupF for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 07:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-2.web-hosting.com (server217-2.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C97D5C157B36 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 07:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=eoe3I5c6Hwl3+PwfcRx5sgYpM8NYeDn7CivpQHzgPVw=; b=UcLRzuMQY2/XiU2yl2HW+T6vaR zLZm08KlOYSemB22gJtGUm9RJx/5r4R/xUidLWoXnhx+AnZoyc8emjItslcTJkQOwjqMb6Pc2ecvs BPZwUGQjocp5WYV2KgATvImftwmd3i402YMc2QeuC2Trsv9IBTiD5xRHwjfw222eYxaDqAdIRylK5 P4MIys9Hoh1bVtpfIEnx6UcuwQhP1E1D2HJB6nTbyGdJOEZ+J+n54H78Ml9U/B3fHSFgzaQYMViC2 E/thiiIMEN1/Vzq5n2AUceIGTkv5xp7n3AZPDCL8dVWwsZjsd5LCtUVttnyFlnrllyC3rYdnqgOTg s6C4jmYg==;
Received: from c-73-29-228-215.hsd1.nj.comcast.net ([73.29.228.215]:54324 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1oGLQR-00DAbR-Ok; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:20:48 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_411EEA88-7548-4546-827F-FBA3E56D8D4C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <42335CAC-1FC8-449C-956F-3739EB7C1845@lurchi.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:20:41 -0400
Cc: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs.ietf@gmx.at>, Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Message-Id: <BF336802-8F6D-46C1-A6A6-4F04B2C0F78D@strayalpha.com>
References: <5fd201f8-5457-3184-302d-c2f653564647@bobbriscoe.net> <9944A719-2FAF-4138-B1A3-4180454FD030@ericsson.com> <899a549f-fc82-a484-1043-28a151ae138d@bobbriscoe.net> <6032F422-60DE-4AC5-A291-E9A731032FED@ericsson.com> <87bd3248-312b-3d1b-8ba9-d4e3c1cfb1d8@gmx.at> <C4C242D1-B5DD-48A8-BB62-28C524C50F72@lurchi.franken.de> <ade43071-85b1-f29b-87d5-c112f4121cc5@gmx.at> <7eff938c-d123-5bdc-49c0-59eee2451c93@bobbriscoe.net> <ECED71F8-37CD-4D56-88FF-F6A147BAD5BB@lurchi.franken.de> <8de888ad-11c2-c927-d8af-6ff255472b03@bobbriscoe.net> <5E6DD477-791A-49B1-A239-0AACFA302D2A@lurchi.franken.de> <3a56998c-949d-f6d9-a95a-9f3d1fe08d1c@gmx.at> <42335CAC-1FC8-449C-956F-3739EB7C1845@lurchi.franken.de>
To: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/h53_A6wEgZp8frXvjAe7hmUadVc>
Subject: [tcpm] Issue with multiple option code points: Re: Early assignment of IANA TCP option number for AccECN
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:20:56 -0000

Hi, all,

Whatever happened to the discussion from 1/27/21 where we all discussed a way that a single TCP option code point could suffice?

I do not support any assignment of multiple code points for a single TCP option (multiple ExIDs are fine, though).

This is especially true for early code points assignments, for which (IMO) the bar ought be higher.
—
Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist
www.strayalpha.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email