[tcpm] WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-converters-08

"Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> Tue, 25 June 2019 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC29120846; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05YF4j2bACWl; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de (mail.hs-esslingen.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76BC120842; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain []) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C430A25A14; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:38:54 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hs-esslingen.de; s=mail; t=1561480734; bh=6zO3hUWWiZK20LZlgSUyHhwESqGt7rsHVCOrX6IUHlk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:From; b=uFTYy6b6wXdohBq1BOAVzp/o6TrY4LE58u1rDGbCqAwCOJcBKtcSQQJtxtjfD3r75 9pAe/IIDsvqAzDJbDeJZcRwSGHCdKlPhU/Rdct/lWIIpvM4zWQUzWAuqmKfLRuKs6U L6MWdeVHtWEx8mgdKJdLmp73R8zG4miRMZq0tsIg=
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.7.1 (20120429) (Debian) at hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de ([]) by localhost (hs-esslingen.de []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4GQQJ_vMobmt; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:38:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rznt8102.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (rznt8102.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:38:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from RZNT8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([]) by rznt8102.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::f977:d5e6:6b09:56ac%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:38:53 +0200
From: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
CC: "tcpm-chairs@ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-converters-08
Thread-Index: AdUrckm1sQAV9Sf8TqW1iT6fsU2Dwg==
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:38:52 +0000
Message-ID: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D35AB8E@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/U1hMS7ym4F6ldnyYLovAdEcwXNM>
Subject: [tcpm] WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-converters-08
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:38:59 -0000

Hi all,

draft-ietf-tcpm-converters has been discussed and reviewed quite a bit.

Therefore, this e-mail starts a working group last call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-tcpm-converters-08 that will run until ***July 14, 2019***.

Please let us know if there are any remaining open issues regarding this document. Statements supporting publication are also welcome. In absence of feedback we will assume that the TCPM consensus is to move the document to the IESG. As discussed in the past, the intended status of the document is experimental.

Thanks a lot

(TCPM co-chair)