[tcpm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-02.txt

"Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com> Sat, 29 October 2016 02:06 UTC

Return-Path: <David.Black@dell.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A885129457; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.from=David.Black@dell.com header.d=dell.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dell.com header.b=k9A7tzd8; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=emc.com header.b=iI7mUFeQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qg_62Il39Jtz; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esa8.dell-outbound.iphmx.com (esa8.dell-outbound.iphmx.com [68.232.149.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C55F129406; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: s=smtpout; d=dell.com; c=simple; q=dns; h=Received:From:Cc:Received:Received:X-DKIM:DKIM-Signature: X-DKIM:Received:Received:Received:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: X-Sentrion-Hostname:X-RSA-Classifications; b=wshj/vu8tdaxE+1uMKH3/tJHVcrbOR9VRDb5id85GQ7fWpN1SEF5yi7z dU5dym+8IRoucDp/T+W46rbDWNGYPXch+aK/hiyRY49LOn4GMaesWh13k r+picxq7unS1JL0qY8JSQUJCIWXNq8sJLvxB2AcReygwXozFr6Cne+J3o A=;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dell.com; i=@dell.com; q=dns/txt; s=smtpout; t=1477706788; x=1509242788; h=from:cc:to:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=16IJOsCZuSNMMwtwEOOZysn6KlqKNaJxxzOapUMgA2w=; b=k9A7tzd8gnQ1QZSYfrS56DAbOPTzoEZhz5rQc0Txv6Ys+gKTRg5+gSQE i1UDxHq5o9ZetjScYvGqTXkfhPQoOxFiW0nWWxVPAkwcf6qDG8DG4Al/f bdly+O6dxz/vUEmC8SgcPzpqnsArF+hBaSMVBjaRV8U55ZTVWd0ByuvsH Q=;
Received: from esa3.dell-outbound2.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.63]) by esa8.dell-outbound.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Oct 2016 21:06:27 -0500
From: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
Received: from mailuogwhop.emc.com ([168.159.213.141]) by esa3.dell-outbound2.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Oct 2016 08:06:27 +0600
Received: from maildlpprd06.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd06.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.38]) by mailuogwprd04.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id u9T26PP2027336 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 22:06:25 -0400
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd04.lss.emc.com u9T26PP2027336
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1477706786; bh=n79s6MMdD/hnmoqIEl3u7VSmKkE=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=iI7mUFeQNakMYKDgKF4fJo3p7l9V5tZqY21mbblr26y1g+a96V0k8ZaXvaG/FdPXm GVfW54B0Z1YQlfInjyN3lSVZJOV4DsUNTYC4lZ0bf/Ex1IAbBgqlcxQyxmFTtHzE83 /i1BP5hvjMFZz5dPK9w7BIgkjzfAOxAnr83cOIxY=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd04.lss.emc.com u9T26PP2027336
Received: from mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.18]) by maildlpprd06.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 22:04:40 -0400
Received: from MXHUB316.corp.emc.com (MXHUB316.corp.emc.com [10.146.3.94]) by mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id u9T266gu013805 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 22:06:07 -0400
Received: from MX307CL04.corp.emc.com ([fe80::849f:5da2:11b:4385]) by MXHUB316.corp.emc.com ([10.146.3.94]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 22:06:06 -0400
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "tcpPrague@ietf.org" <tcpPrague@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSMYhxPK/++Q1yqUuTvYdsXsouuaC+rfCg
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 02:06:05 +0000
Message-ID: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F70099C@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
References: <147770651989.24883.8392540470740722082.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <147770651989.24883.8392540470740722082.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.238.44.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Uqk6NSOq4oBmMcitXIInR8pXrhY>
Cc: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
Subject: [tcpm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-02.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 02:06:30 -0000

The changes in  the -02 version from the -01 are primarily courtesy of a
thorough review by Bob Briscoe.

Whether to require (MUST) or strongly encourage (SHOULD) use of ECT(0)
and not ECT(1) is an open issue that ought to be discussed in Seoul (TSVWG
is the likely venue).

As an individual, I request that this draft be put on the TSVWG agenda for
Seoul with a request for TSVWG WG adoption.

Thanks, --David

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 10:02 PM
To: Black, David
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-02.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by David Black and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation
Revision:	02
Title:		Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation
Document date:	2016-10-28
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		12
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-02.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-02
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-02

Abstract:
   Multiple protocol experiments have been proposed that involve changes
   to Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) as specified in RFC 3168.
   This memo summarizes the proposed areas of experimentation to provide
   an overview to the Internet community and updates RFC 3168, a
   Proposed Standard RFC, to allow the experiments to proceed without
   requiring a standards process exception for each Experimental RFC to
   update RFC 3168.  Each experiment is still required to be documented
   in an Experimental RFC.  In addition, this memo makes related updates
   to the ECN specifications for RTP in RFC 6679 and to the ECN
   specifications for DCCP in RFC 4341, RFC 4342 and RFC 5622.  This
   memo also records the conclusion of the ECN Nonce experiment in RFC
   3540, obsoletes RFC 3540 and reclassifies it as Historic to enable
   new experimental use of the ECT(1) codepoint.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat