IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Test vectors for RFC5925 algorithms?

juhamatk@gmail.com Fri, 17 April 2020 06:20 UTC

Return-Path: <juhamatk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCF73A0D83 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QB6ThEptz-rX for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE00C3A0D80 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id u127so594924wmg.1 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uM5hUQvHcCUuBT3AcL9OKkSa8/05tLYg+u1eJc10YIY=; b=lq8CM3uDW+6T+R0LiamlW//YAqhxxffqj+PaF2UfTBrWNnFigP9oaeLHpr+BtQaMxe LeziFQKnQo9AlcTOklnRMq8CbZAzCNZ2Y/MivFZOfRFPmcK7HJtfOx9+72xMebphUv9n sq572dHctgtiXDPsEuPsTPDIki9E0dvUzfFFMZUfAG+mj7fRm+mwlrJTknnB9oyqklHe aKBifJDBq2JUNje6FNvWuANBh9rL0GVtVd505xeqxPP7PVuwSBPyZ5RrM8j/7Hr5TxXq LY0yzgrmzLEQNnUQpDzmOGugSg79KbrNdouQtG2lN2yN7Fb7+8iOqm+QpUXvfKmmCAO2 8opw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uM5hUQvHcCUuBT3AcL9OKkSa8/05tLYg+u1eJc10YIY=; b=EdNhR++LrYB0MtVjOdVeO4fNJMXzLTEz0nFY1kOBAcFzSUsV8zNmLUjBMEqKiqBioa xFLyPwos/w9Qz166lPmixLfYJkVp45Vd3wFbel9ejVvQ1zgAOC1vfI1C90Ml2G/wol3b EEe9XqrACWTz3s7VEDppP0C7WEA10w5UDpsGI8x9rche+nHjepdOGp4q/qEPeedR8drn WDdsq+1rJf5A5BqkV88VfEPzXUWStCE0YMwkzCE/+HKqpkxt1gKZ3WF4xY/Rj8jjvwpD 0TGKCtw+k0Nm6PxW5y9HAu+Qx7L0fCgo0MO/M+x9YhDHWBq/OxsdNbdSNjRoK8ElFmFX NpHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubTO9GyKuMqx1x5FzABo6HOzboz8M1SH3Hy+qzwhDYFK3xfH74s mim/iwiAFGhu8zwjr54F9UTnCS/YhHTmkPtYmfiA+BNjROA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKEdflUjJSOklKMgHfJZ6SMZl2mEX+mg4AmJ0woZukSl5rUGMaB4jRu+UHu7aQ23uXXrGWWKxS+KQDuA11r36k=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6741:: with SMTP id b62mr838396wmc.22.1587104439929; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACS3ZpCawjTF4YMg+Rm7pOkjO2NQB-BZLBvobZCg2kyRQgaNzw@mail.gmail.com> <AFABEFAB-AA58-4599-94E3-06889E38DC01@strayalpha.com> <CACS3ZpAqdeF6xivndh7EqOqwYebyziyP6AQkKVWZww6nC=Zo0Q@mail.gmail.com> <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DA4B5C7@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de> <CACS3ZpAyYahfCfibCKwZkb6u3VAk2UiXViMGbdH3t76iUyY5fw@mail.gmail.com> <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DA73D5B@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DA73D5B@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
From: juhamatk@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:20:22 +0300
Message-ID: <CACS3ZpAkyVjWWpxMCCU4M8qX5OR6+AjkA6_QoSBc5y9NdaWSHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
Cc: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/VeuxVHw3ayNrP5LtWhG__GMPRYA>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Test vectors for RFC5925 algorithms?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:20:49 -0000

Hello Michael,

On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 19:31, Scharf, Michael
<Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> wrote:
> > > Have you checked other router vendors? For instance, the public Cisco IOS XE
> > documentation lists TCP-AO support. And I have also heard that another main
> > router vendor may implement TCP-AO (well, I am not familiar with Juniper).
> >
> > I am aware that Cisco has an implementation. It is quite new, and
> > unfortunately I do have experience of it. If someone has, then that
> > may well be a very good candidate for test vectors.
>
> Coming back to this, as I have just found another document: According to reference [1], Nokia SROS implements TCP-AO as well.

Thanks! RFC 5925 and RFC 5926 are indeed listed as supported. Not many
configuration examples, though. As with Cisco, I do not personally
have experience of Nokia products. As Nokia SROS seems to have support
at some level, it may well be another candidate for test vectors.

> Michael
>
>
> [1] Nokia SROS documentation at https://documentation.nokia.com/cgi-bin/dbaccessfilename.cgi/3HE15811AAAATQZZA01_V1_7450%20ESS%207750%20SR%207950%20XRS%20and%20VSR%20Basic%20System%20Configuration%20Guide%2020.2.R1.pdf
--
 Juhamatti

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email