IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Test vectors for RFC5925 algorithms?

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Thu, 11 June 2020 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034073A0AB0 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ZjGCy2L8u_J for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4494F3A0AAA for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BqqKBxJ2WjWJvFuptntBOWdsgrVAe6d8MXJcmZA9RHQ=; b=CsS8mJ0drrNu+u53YUwcLfVXX Yb9NvJOTyfGyBn/SoTzem3EqUCbn8VU3Z/8t+OQm1vEXyOs3uHtXrEpw78H8bbI5qQV7SrbsldGMF mTHGPopz74Buuwlp5mehaMTHXK7/SN5KqgewyXa+7dxbtL0rciv7fDrDm3bqig1BN43dwKP4Y0uu4 kN+rFLytVVopnWzYs9IH5mhYvfriLyoddfYybvlZ8SA5VhNhtT3mA/JN1p7Yd7/N5c45/yqzn/xhr 4SUfp3zK+pGZBzbgHPysMny9hyDAy3gxzXGyypSHHiUtThsm0WSiTm9zvAQnz4mJHdiR19KSiD6an T9o54pPNg==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:50659 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1jjQI6-001Txp-CO; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 12:43:02 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0F9E451D-3191-4C0A-AAB5-318B898AA5A6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DC3B40E@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:42:58 -0700
Cc: "juhamatk@gmail.com" <juhamatk@gmail.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <60CD1EE5-99D2-4E33-BB56-A8BC0D6F0261@strayalpha.com>
References: <CACS3ZpCawjTF4YMg+Rm7pOkjO2NQB-BZLBvobZCg2kyRQgaNzw@mail.gmail.com> <AFABEFAB-AA58-4599-94E3-06889E38DC01@strayalpha.com> <CACS3ZpAqdeF6xivndh7EqOqwYebyziyP6AQkKVWZww6nC=Zo0Q@mail.gmail.com> <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DA4B5C7@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de> <CACS3ZpAyYahfCfibCKwZkb6u3VAk2UiXViMGbdH3t76iUyY5fw@mail.gmail.com> <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DA73D5B@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de> <CE38B4DB-63FB-4C34-A064-EA87E22AA689@strayalpha.com> <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DC3B40E@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
To: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/VqXiFvRw5qdlQ3T44jOePTVNlaw>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Test vectors for RFC5925 algorithms?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:43:06 -0000

Thanks. At this time, I haven’t included this sort of product reference to the draft, but it is useful to know.

Joe

> On Jun 8, 2020, at 12:21 AM, Scharf, Michael <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Joe,
>  
> Page 700 of link [1] references RFC 5925 and RFC 5926.
>  
> I don’t have access to a Nokia router to actually test the implementation. Yet, as far as I know, listing an RFC in the standard compliance lists of a Nokia product implies that the standard is indeed implemented.
>  
> Michael
>  
> From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com <mailto:touch@strayalpha.com>> 
> Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2020 10:52 PM
> To: Scharf, Michael <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de <mailto:Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>>
> Cc: juhamatk@gmail.com <mailto:juhamatk@gmail.com>; tcpm@ietf.org <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [tcpm] Test vectors for RFC5925 algorithms?
>  
> Hi, Michael,
>  
> The link below doesn’t appear to reference TCP-AO. Do you know of a link with a more direct reference?
>  
> Joe
> 
> 
> On Apr 16, 2020, at 9:31 AM, Scharf, Michael <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de <mailto:Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>> wrote:
>  
> Have you checked other router vendors? For instance, the public Cisco IOS XE
> documentation lists TCP-AO support. And I have also heard that another main
> router vendor may implement TCP-AO (well, I am not familiar with Juniper).
> 
> I am aware that Cisco has an implementation. It is quite new, and
> unfortunately I do have experience of it. If someone has, then that
> may well be a very good candidate for test vectors.
> 
> Coming back to this, as I have just found another document: According to reference [1], Nokia SROS implements TCP-AO as well.
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> [1] Nokia SROS documentation at https://documentation.nokia.com/cgi-bin/dbaccessfilename.cgi/3HE15811AAAATQZZA01_V1_7450%20ESS%207750%20SR%207950%20XRS%20and%20VSR%20Basic%20System%20Configuration%20Guide%2020.2.R1.pdf <https://documentation.nokia.com/cgi-bin/dbaccessfilename.cgi/3HE15811AAAATQZZA01_V1_7450%20ESS%207750%20SR%207950%20XRS%20and%20VSR%20Basic%20System%20Configuration%20Guide%2020.2.R1.pdf>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email