IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-balasubramanian-tcpm-hystartplusplus-03

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Thu, 14 May 2020 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mallman@icsi.berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A303A0B4C for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZvXZjlaD2at9 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-f178.google.com (mail-oi1-f178.google.com [209.85.167.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD7A33A0B3B for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-f178.google.com with SMTP id a2so24661770oia.11 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=qMcsPd8mb5KF/uNa29CNP9LuBu0TYrt9cynlk5IZlHg=; b=eAEuGjfw4SiZ1BY5ArCwJCyFCX1hArfZpgbj7DeXzzPHxtoVZYG1Fb7SwuRXAiYA8m TO9Cv4kb8TS5YCidG26qMgEtt9O+t1baSPPPFo9LcAEzORHCie/6HG8tMEmBUSkzMH19 lCYbZwhDZFAcfAN8kaZkc4mq59e4Wxu+dkoWfGWQOsX+ZZuUndcMtfaUo+jVRdA9fRln I6hBwz5xRDQpedyeaIyDqRgWYsgce/DRSKUVmwuS6xRwOqysvt7PIeRijSEZ/NBcC8sM MZ/t5vcu1MRTC1KxtlsfMXnjky5rBSah2AbYQuZji9Opw7e0RoSwnSjd4S6Y+HJFKUZ8 CX8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZqOjDuR2o46C+o5+oSaFIeRdwi3R8VWnVlCqH/L9dZzFw8SgAI G2kNggD7gHNKlDUFKa+rUmmoUg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL4FKfo3IU/Z+pnsepOTjHz5R3bqD8dBNw1AoqDK4s6pjBm16VRJj9nTC0QrOoly1u0k4/Fvw==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:d06:: with SMTP id 6mr28865046oin.78.1589469890958; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.244] ([2600:1700:b380:3f00:c05e:7082:6b2e:3f06]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u13sm864968oor.45.2020.05.14.08.24.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 May 2020 08:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>, draft-balasubramanian-tcpm-hystartplusplus@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 11:24:48 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <172F0536-8FEE-4F7E-AADA-19CF30077B8F@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQykh+Srg++Yp2-c5yh8ikVHgBQvxDWeLpOp=7B3XV1Vz6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D963CFA8-5851-40EE-BA70-2522BB99C1C1@fh-muenster.de> <B581E2C0-D2EF-4AAE-951B-27A404A6427F@icir.org> <CADVnQykh+Srg++Yp2-c5yh8ikVHgBQvxDWeLpOp=7B3XV1Vz6g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_60BD7769-27F9-4333-95E6-B51C6BB9E790_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/WSH-5LgOB5lumPYXQgonhPcmM6Q>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-balasubramanian-tcpm-hystartplusplus-03
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 15:24:58 -0000

Neal-

Based on your note it seems that it should be straightforward to add
solid motivation in the document.  (And, hopefully your high-level
notions of finding that it works well can readily be turned into
objective statements.)  So, why don't we just do that?

> However, I would urge that these concerns be addressed in future
> editorial revisions,

My issue is that this is **not** editorial.  There is simply nothing
in the document that suggests it is a good idea.  That fact is
completely independent of whether it is or is not a good idea.  It
just means there is no basis to judge given in the document.  We
should expect some explanation of why this is reasonable before the
WG is asked to adopt and work on something.  IMHO.

allman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email