[tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-03.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon, 05 March 2018 23:11 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4DF126BFD; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 15:11:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.74.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152029151070.12715.15497200993114582811@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 15:11:50 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/alAZeYyoAi6RGps0scAXWgOJ770>
Subject: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-03.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 23:11:51 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG of the IETF. Title : RACK: a time-based fast loss detection algorithm for TCP Authors : Yuchung Cheng Neal Cardwell Nandita Dukkipati Priyaranjan Jha Filename : draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-03.txt Pages : 25 Date : 2018-03-05 Abstract: This document presents a new TCP loss detection algorithm called RACK ("Recent ACKnowledgment"). RACK uses the notion of time, instead of packet or sequence counts, to detect losses, for modern TCP implementations that can support per-packet timestamps and the selective acknowledgment (SACK) option. It is intended to replace the conventional DUPACK threshold approach and its variants, as well as other nonstandard approaches. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-rack/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-03 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-03.txt internet-drafts
- [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting reord… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Yuchung Cheng
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… rs.ietf
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Yuchung Cheng
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Yuchung Cheng
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… rs.ietf
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Olivier Bonaventure
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Sowmini Varadhan
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Yuchung Cheng
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Yuchung Cheng
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… rs.ietf
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Matt Mathis
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Yuchung Cheng
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… touch
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting r… Joe Touch