IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting reordering window to reordering degree

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Tue, 27 March 2018 05:40 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE45612711A for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 22:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.99
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RgdHBP3U5wlN for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 22:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B52D41270AC for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 22:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=poByADcOvJ5tr6Vc39id5n28ElOtWQ8z6dMmo+PHWdo=; b=16bVpv0Gws57Ex0Mcx/CeXg22 C9SU1r5VciMPA2Sfbs1ipbSgrmwTK31pwcp/j2MlWgU6kvZScZigg8mOoi4VXH1z+432dV5WpU3Px EcefIOvi47eMukhsuF11UvdhQXJIdup32GEudWWu/YfK7lAHV7QHBJZkROitdpc3g3NpGbi2nBp73 cx9vXLzkb9VugNSJZw1hCnILo1NYzKKqzc4GNO6GcdBWaaFS1nmBoao1CwBnJLboIWKiy8q0aqIu0 L/MZGKa5Ymb8xMRZWS89VU3Y3cNXOpNVf6j/E/Uyp8Hk63HV4BvaZTw87qn8ZTdmWHxS7q4jLHP+h MIue0zyFg==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-240-132.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.240.132]:54869 helo=[192.168.1.179]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1f0hLS-001m8W-LP; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 01:40:31 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15D100)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR21MB0630B185DB997C389EEF1810B6AD0@CY4PR21MB0630.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 22:40:25 -0700
Cc: Olivier Bonaventure <olivier.bonaventure@tessares.net>, Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-tcpm-rack@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tcpm-rack@tools.ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5784486C-1DEF-43E1-B2C7-E61DF4C19178@strayalpha.com>
References: <152029151070.12715.15497200993114582811@ietfa.amsl.com> <c45b807e-8076-71fd-28ea-861db62c9bbd@bobbriscoe.net> <284E217A-4A12-4EC1-A9C6-52B6FFF67FFD@tessares.net> <CY4PR21MB0630B185DB997C389EEF1810B6AD0@CY4PR21MB0630.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
To: Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb@microsoft.com>
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/w56mJpVDsoCD7U3-j2JhhDwvAXg>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Vicious or Virtuous circle? Adapting reordering window to reordering degree
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 05:40:55 -0000


> On Mar 26, 2018, at 8:45 AM, Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Deliberate reordering is not an acceptable network behavior,

Reordering, dropping, and repeating packets are all valid IP network phenomena. 

There is no need to infer intent to decide otherwise. 

Joe

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status