IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-03.txt

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Wed, 30 April 2014 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBB51A886D for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VTPM50XdjdKl for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob04.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob04.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FB01A094A for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.203]) by atl4mhob04.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s3UJI6SG021372 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:18:06 -0400
Received: (qmail 3584 invoked by uid 0); 30 Apr 2014 19:18:06 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 107.48.66.212
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.43.65?) (wes@mti-systems.com@107.48.66.212) by 0 with ESMTPA; 30 Apr 2014 19:18:06 -0000
Message-ID: <53614C68.8040301@mti-systems.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:18:00 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
References: <20140430142220.21274.18191.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <53610C3B.6070006@akamai.com> <B98116CE-28AA-4A50-87F3-EF90967CCBBC@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <B98116CE-28AA-4A50-87F3-EF90967CCBBC@netapp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/aqR6DzW3W6qxmMoA4IIT0XVIBcU
Subject: Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-williams-exp-tcp-host-id-opt-03.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:18:13 -0000

On 4/30/2014 10:51 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> For the record, I am opposed to the WG taking this document on, and I
> am opposed to it being published as an RFC on any stream.
> 


My opinion is similar.

An RFC isn't necessary to use an ExID.  It doesn't require IETF
approval, and is unlikely to get IETF approval, in order to do
this in a system, if you really want to discount the problems
and do it anyways.


-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status