Re: [tcpm] Adoption of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic?

["Zimmermann, Alexander" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Michael,

> Am 18.03.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Scharf, Michael (Michael) <[e-mail]>:
> 
> My understanding is that TCPM recharting is still pending and IESG waits for potential feedback until March 23 [1].
> 
> The chairs are well aware of the strong support for draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic during IETF 91. We plan to run a formal adoption call once our charter explicitly allows adoption in TCPM.

Sounds good!

Thanks for update

Alex

> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg09489.html
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tcpm [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Scheffenegger,
>> Richard
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 11:03 AM
>> To: [e-mail]
>> Cc: [e-mail]
>> Subject: [tcpm] Adoption of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic?
>> 
>> Michael, Yoshi, Pasi,
>> 
>> 
>> after the recharter of TCPM, which now specifically states " TCPM may
>> document alternative TCP congestion control algorithms
>> that are known to be widely deployed", we would like to raise the
>> question if we can start a call for adoption of
>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-00.txt ? During
>> the IETF91, there was strong consensus in the room to adopt this
>> document and put it on standards track:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/wg/tcpm/minutes?item=minutes-91-tcpm.html
>> 
>>> From our understanding, Cubic fully qualifies to be considered as a
>> legitimate WG document after the recharter. Again, no technical work on
>> the cubic algorithm would be done, as explained by Lars in Honolulu,
>> just tracking what changes went into the existing implementations since
>> the initial writing of the document.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>>  Alex and Richard
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: tcpm [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of IETF
>> Secretariat
>>> Sent: Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015 20:10
>>> To: [e-mail]
>>> Subject: [tcpm] Milestones changed for tcpm WG
>>> 
>>> Changed milestone "Submit document obsoleting undeployed TCP
>> extensions to
>>> the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC", set state to
>> active
>>> from review, accepting new milestone.
>>> 
>>> URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tcpm/charter/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tcpm mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> tcpm mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm