IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Adoption of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic?

"Scharf, Michael (Michael)" <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 18 March 2015 10:18 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D7D1A0004 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 03:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SNHHjj0wJP1S for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 03:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B7D71A000B for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 03:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id CC98E84E27181; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:18:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t2IAIcax010082 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:18:39 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.102]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:18:38 +0100
From: "Scharf, Michael (Michael)" <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>, "tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Adoption of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic?
Thread-Index: AdBhYjpPZb+rJ+RBQHOjk5FmqEicXAAAbAKg
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:18:37 +0000
Message-ID: <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D16C60F4D@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <ae97de90f83c460f8cfd0273f47611dd@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <ae97de90f83c460f8cfd0273f47611dd@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/vffQYIhwJk9ScReCBpmF2P9oRA4>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Adoption of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:18:43 -0000

My understanding is that TCPM recharting is still pending and IESG waits for potential feedback until March 23 [1].

The chairs are well aware of the strong support for draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic during IETF 91. We plan to run a formal adoption call once our charter explicitly allows adoption in TCPM.

Michael


[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg09489.html


> -----Original Message-----
> From: tcpm [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Scheffenegger,
> Richard
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 11:03 AM
> To: tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
> Subject: [tcpm] Adoption of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic?
> 
> Michael, Yoshi, Pasi,
> 
> 
> after the recharter of TCPM, which now specifically states " TCPM may
> document alternative TCP congestion control algorithms
> that are known to be widely deployed", we would like to raise the
> question if we can start a call for adoption of
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-00.txt ? During
> the IETF91, there was strong consensus in the room to adopt this
> document and put it on standards track:
> https://tools.ietf.org/wg/tcpm/minutes?item=minutes-91-tcpm.html
> 
> >From our understanding, Cubic fully qualifies to be considered as a
> legitimate WG document after the recharter. Again, no technical work on
> the cubic algorithm would be done, as explained by Lars in Honolulu,
> just tracking what changes went into the existing implementations since
> the initial writing of the document.
> 
> Best regards,
>   Alex and Richard
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tcpm [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of IETF
> Secretariat
> > Sent: Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015 20:10
> > To: tcpm@ietf.org
> > Subject: [tcpm] Milestones changed for tcpm WG
> >
> > Changed milestone "Submit document obsoleting undeployed TCP
> extensions to
> > the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC", set state to
> active
> > from review, accepting new milestone.
> >
> > URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tcpm/charter/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tcpm mailing list
> > tcpm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email