IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] WGLC: NCR draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-dcr-06.txt ENDS 27 Jan 2006

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Mon, 23 January 2006 14:56 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F137a-0003jg-9Q; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:56:42 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F137Z-0003jb-Mh for tcpm@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:56:41 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA25213 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:55:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from wyvern.icir.org ([192.150.187.14]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F13Gv-0000rP-E0 for tcpm@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:06:22 -0500
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-69-222-35-58.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [69.222.35.58]) by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0NEuWVC005369; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:56:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mallman@guns.icir.org)
Received: from guns.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBD677A9D9; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:56:31 -0500 (EST)
To: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WGLC: NCR draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-dcr-06.txt ENDS 27 Jan 2006
In-Reply-To: <43D298E8.4090105@wizmail.org>
Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR)
Song-of-the-Day: The Other Side
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:56:31 -0500
Message-Id: <20060123145631.8BBD677A9D9@guns.icir.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1067834634=="
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

> Does reordering have as bad an effect on a congested link
> as on an uncongested link?  

My own guess is that on a congested link the congestion would have more
of an impact than reordering.  I think that if reordering ends up being
the dominant phenomenon then the path will not be (as) congested because
of the slow downs from false congestion signals.

But, this would clearly be something to look at with real measurements
and not just wave one's hands over as I am doing.

> In any case, I'm not arguing against the draft becoming Experimental.

Great, thanks!

allman




_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email