IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Comments on Soft Errors I-D: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-06

Lloyd Wood <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk> Mon, 02 July 2007 20:28 UTC

Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5SVP-00073I-Gn; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:28:19 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5SVP-00071e-24 for tcpm@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:28:19 -0400
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.140]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5SVL-0006HU-N4 for tcpm@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:28:19 -0400
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2007 22:28:15 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAAX8iEaQ/uCLh2dsb2JhbACPKAIJDiw
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.16,488,1175464800"; d="scan'208"; a="147051722:sNHT24231550"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l62KSEHE009969; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 22:28:14 +0200
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l62KS9TC013604; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 20:28:14 GMT
Received: from lwood-wxp01.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp4668.cisco.com [10.61.82.59]) by cisco.com (8.8.8-Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA01892; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:28:06 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200707022028.VAA01892@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:27:34 +0100
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
From: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Comments on Soft Errors I-D: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-06
In-Reply-To: <46895C7F.7060307@isi.edu>
References: <C2AE92AA.7486%gf@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <46895C7F.7060307@isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk; dkim=neutral
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, tcpm@ietf.org, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

At Monday 02/07/2007 13:13 -0700, Joe Touch wrote:
>There are exceptions, such as
>where multiple IP addresses are used for shared web service -- though
>that has fallen out of use as newer HTTP protocols determine the host in
>the request (sending GET and the DNS name, in addition to the filename)
>rather than only by the IP address (which was the only way compatible
>with HTTP 1.0, e.g.).

Care to elaborate?

Your claims don't match what e.g. RFC1945 specifies, or what HTTP 1.0 did.

L.


<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk> 

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email