Re: [tcpm] Comments on Soft Errors I-D: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-06

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Tue, 03 July 2007 02:18 UTC

Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5XyN-0003OG-AH; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:18:35 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5XyK-0003L9-DC for tcpm@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:18:32 -0400
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5XyK-0007jj-1u for tcpm@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:18:32 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.45] (pool-72-81-85-53.phlapa.east.verizon.net [72.81.85.53]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l632I0Qo014995; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 19:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4689B1D5.2040502@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:17:57 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Comments on Soft Errors I-D: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-06
References: <C2AE92AA.7486%gf@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <46895C7F.7060307@isi.edu> <200707022028.VAA01892@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <200707022028.VAA01892@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e8a67952aa972b528dd04570d58ad8fe
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, tcpm@ietf.org, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1976934313=="
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org


Lloyd Wood wrote:
> At Monday 02/07/2007 13:13 -0700, Joe Touch wrote:
>> There are exceptions, such as
>> where multiple IP addresses are used for shared web service -- though
>> that has fallen out of use as newer HTTP protocols determine the host in
>> the request (sending GET and the DNS name, in addition to the filename)
>> rather than only by the IP address (which was the only way compatible
>> with HTTP 1.0, e.g.).
> 
> Care to elaborate?
> 
> Your claims don't match what e.g. RFC1945 specifies, or what HTTP 1.0 did.

In 1.0 http://www.abc.com/ means
	open a connection to an IP address www.abc.com resolves to
	then issue "GET /"

In 1.1, the same URL means
	open a connection to an IP address www.abc.com resolves to
	then issue "GET / HTTP/1.1 HOST: www.abc.com"

This helps when www.abc.com and www.def.com are on the same host. In
1.0, they had to have different IP addresses*, with servers listening on
port 80 specific to those IP addresses. The address isn't actually sent
(sorry that it was implied above).

*(they could have different ports, but I'm focusing on the common case
where the port isn't specified, e.g., for common public servers)

In 1.1, you could have a single server listening on both IP addresses,
with each HOST name bound to a different file root. The HOST option
could indicate which DNS name's root to use.

Joe



_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm